Diagnostic criteria and severity assessment for syndesmosis injury using magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review

High ankle sprains involving syndesmosis injury present challenges in both diagnosis and severity assessment. Magnetic resonance imaging is widely regarded as the preferred modality for evaluating syndesmosis injury and related structural damage. This systematic review primarily examined the diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging. Secondarily, it explores grading and prognostics of syndesmosis injuries with magnetic resonance imaging and identified possible imaging parameters predictive of injury severity. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and Scopus was performed through February 12, 2025, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Peer-reviewed human studies in English that used magnetic resonance imaging to assess syndesmosis injury were included. Excluded were review articles, case reports, abstract-only studies, and biomechanical or cadaveric investigations. Twenty-seven studies comprising 1931 ankles met inclusion criteria. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for complete tears of the anterior and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligaments. Ancillary signs such as the ring-of-fire edema pattern, distal tibiofibular joint effusion, and widening of the distal joint space exhibited high specificity with variable sensitivity and may assist in grading injury severity. Magnetic resonance imaging in chronic syndesmosis injury primarily detects fibrotic scarring and post-injury changes. Evidence gaps remain regarding the parameters that best determine injury severity and indicate early surgical intervention in competitive athletes. Consolidating multiple magnetic resonance imaging findings into standardized diagnostic criteria may improve reliability and clinical decision-making.