Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results

Objectives: Most countries in Latin America have committed to adopting HEARTS, PAHO's recommended approach for managing hypertension and diabetes in national primary care health systems. This study aimed to understand and refine a HEARTS pilot for scale-up in Guatemala. Methods: Team members conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 patients and health workers participating in a HEARTS pilot across 10 primary care facilities in Guatemala's Ministry of Health system. Researchers analyzed interviews using a combined inductive-deductive approach alongside the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework and used convergent mixed methods to generate meta-inferences. Results: Despite high feasibility and acceptability scores, health workers described tensions between HEARTS and competing responsibilities. Patients described rational navigation of an unreliable system, a more fitting explanation for low retention than noncompliance. Both patients and health workers understood HEARTS as another externally funded project with uncertain sustainability. Medication availability improved during the pilot, but district and facility-level incentive structures perpetuated supply unreliability. Greater absolute treatment gains for hypertension than for diabetes likely reflected health worker comfort and preexisting access to blood pressure monitoring supplies. Both patients and health workers identified education gaps. Integration of qualitative and quantitative findings suggested concrete scale-up refinements, including simplifying treatment protocols, strengthening diabetes components, focusing training on nurses, reforming central-level pharmaceutical supply policies, and securing high-level Ministry of Health commitments. Conclusions: A HEARTS pilot trial in Guatemala met pre-specified quantitative outcomes, but qualitative and mixed-methods approaches revealed key barriers. These findings will assist in refining HEARTS in Guatemala for planned national scale-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06080451).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Published
2026-11-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2026.98
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results

Anita Nandkumar Chary, Irmgardt Alicia Wellmann, Taryn McGinn Valley, David Flood et al.
1 citations
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Health Policy Implementation Science
4.82
article

Understanding implementation of HEARTS for hypertension and diabetes in Guatemala: qualitative and mixed-methods pilot results

Anita Nandkumar Chary, Irmgardt Alicia Wellmann, Taryn McGinn Valley, David Flood, Mark D. Huffman, Manuel Ramírez‐Zea, Nia Lucas, Rocío Donis, Luis Fernando Ayala, Ana Irina Argeli Alvarez Nufio, Peter Rohloff, Chris Santizo-Malafronti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Most countries in Latin America have committed to adopting HEARTS, PAHO's recommended approach for managing hypertension and diabetes in national primary care health systems. This study aimed to understand and refine a HEARTS pilot for scale-up in Guatemala. Methods: Team members conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 patients and health workers participating in a HEARTS pilot across 10 primary care facilities in Guatemala's Ministry of Health system. Researchers analyzed interviews using a combined inductive-deductive approach alongside the Tailored Implementation in Chronic Diseases framework and used convergent mixed methods to generate meta-inferences. Results: Despite high feasibility and acceptability scores, health workers described tensions between HEARTS and competing responsibilities. Patients described rational navigation of an unreliable system, a more fitting explanation for low retention than noncompliance. Both patients and health workers understood HEARTS as another externally funded project with uncertain sustainability. Medication availability improved during the pilot, but district and facility-level incentive structures perpetuated supply unreliability. Greater absolute treatment gains for hypertension than for diabetes likely reflected health worker comfort and preexisting access to blood pressure monitoring supplies. Both patients and health workers identified education gaps. Integration of qualitative and quantitative findings suggested concrete scale-up refinements, including simplifying treatment protocols, strengthening diabetes components, focusing training on nurses, reforming central-level pharmaceutical supply policies, and securing high-level Ministry of Health commitments. Conclusions: A HEARTS pilot trial in Guatemala met pre-specified quantitative outcomes, but qualitative and mixed-methods approaches revealed key barriers. These findings will assist in refining HEARTS in Guatemala for planned national scale-up. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06080451).

Revista Panamericana de Salud PúblicaVol. 50
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Arizona (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Michigan (US), Ministry of Public Health and Social Assistance (GT), Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (GT)
National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Health Policy Implementation Science
4.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon