ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1325 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF FACTOR IIA VERSUS XA INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS: A DOAC-CVT SUBSTUDY

Abstract Background and aims DOACs are increasingly used to treat cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but comparative data between types of DOACs are limited. We compared dabigatran (factor IIa inhibitor) with factor Xa inhibitors regarding effectiveness and safety. Methods We used data from the DOAC-CVT study, which was an international, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, that compared the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists in adult patients with CVT. DOAC-treated patients were grouped as dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitor users, based on the first used DOAC. The primary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism at 12 months; secondary outcomes included favorable outcome (mRS:0-1), mortality, and bleeding (major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding [ISTH criteria]). Binary logistic regression was applied. Results Of 619 included patients, 401 (64.8%) received a DOAC: 270 (67.3%) dabigatran and 131 (32.6%) a factor Xa inhibitor (65 apixaban, 60 rivaroxaban, 6 edoxaban). Dabigatran users were more frequently from high-income countries (72.9%vs54.2%). The primary outcome occurred in 12 (4.4%) dabigatran versus 2 (1.5%) factor Xa inhibitor users (aOR:3.28, 95%CI:0.70–15.48). Bleeding events were more frequent with dabigatran (15/270 [5.6%]) than factor Xa inhibitors (2/131 [1.5%]; aOR:4.80 [95%CI:1.00–23.04]). There was no difference in favorable outcome (80.7%vs80.0%, aOR:1.12, 95%CI:0.64–1.95) or mortality (0.7%vs3.0%, aOR:0.39, 95%CI:0.06–2.34). Conclusions Among DOAC-treated patients with CVT, use of dabigatran was possibly associated with more bleeding events than Factor Xa inhibitors. No difference in clinical outcome was found. Conflict of interest J.M.C. received funding from the Netherlands Thrombosis Foundation, grants from Bayer and AstraZeneca, and is co-founder and shareholder of TrianecT. K.J. has received academic grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the country councils, academic grants from the Swedish Stroke Association, and consulting fees from Janssen. All other author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this abstract.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.640
Primary Topic
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1325 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF FACTOR IIA VERSUS XA INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS: A DOAC-CVT SUBSTUDY

Eva Bakker, Mayte Sánchez van Kammen, Katarina Jood, Jelle Vellema et al.
European Stroke Journal
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1325 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF FACTOR IIA VERSUS XA INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF CEREBRAL VENOUS THROMBOSIS: A DOAC-CVT SUBSTUDY

Eva Bakker, Mayte Sánchez van Kammen, Katarina Jood, Jelle Vellema, Jonathan Coutinho, Jose Ferro, J Putaala, Anita van de Munckhof, Turgut Tatlisumak, Diana Aguiar de Sousa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims DOACs are increasingly used to treat cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), but comparative data between types of DOACs are limited. We compared dabigatran (factor IIa inhibitor) with factor Xa inhibitors regarding effectiveness and safety. Methods We used data from the DOAC-CVT study, which was an international, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study, that compared the safety and effectiveness of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists in adult patients with CVT. DOAC-treated patients were grouped as dabigatran and factor Xa inhibitor users, based on the first used DOAC. The primary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism at 12 months; secondary outcomes included favorable outcome (mRS:0-1), mortality, and bleeding (major plus clinically relevant non-major bleeding [ISTH criteria]). Binary logistic regression was applied. Results Of 619 included patients, 401 (64.8%) received a DOAC: 270 (67.3%) dabigatran and 131 (32.6%) a factor Xa inhibitor (65 apixaban, 60 rivaroxaban, 6 edoxaban). Dabigatran users were more frequently from high-income countries (72.9%vs54.2%). The primary outcome occurred in 12 (4.4%) dabigatran versus 2 (1.5%) factor Xa inhibitor users (aOR:3.28, 95%CI:0.70–15.48). Bleeding events were more frequent with dabigatran (15/270 [5.6%]) than factor Xa inhibitors (2/131 [1.5%]; aOR:4.80 [95%CI:1.00–23.04]). There was no difference in favorable outcome (80.7%vs80.0%, aOR:1.12, 95%CI:0.64–1.95) or mortality (0.7%vs3.0%, aOR:0.39, 95%CI:0.06–2.34). Conclusions Among DOAC-treated patients with CVT, use of dabigatran was possibly associated with more bleeding events than Factor Xa inhibitors. No difference in clinical outcome was found. Conflict of interest J.M.C. received funding from the Netherlands Thrombosis Foundation, grants from Bayer and AstraZeneca, and is co-founder and shareholder of TrianecT. K.J. has received academic grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the country councils, academic grants from the Swedish Stroke Association, and consulting fees from Janssen. All other author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this abstract.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Lisbon (PT), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE), Unidade Local de Saúde de São José (PT), Hospital da Luz (PT), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.