ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2314 STRENGTHENING STROKE RECOVERY RESEARCH THROUGH IMPROVED REHABILITATION INTERVENTION REPORTING: THE TIDIER-REHAB CHECKLIST

Abstract Background and aims Stroke rehabilitation interventions are complex, multi-component, and highly individualised. Inadequate reporting of intervention content, dosage, and personalisation remains a major barrier to replication, evidence synthesis, and translation into clinical practice. Although the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist supports general intervention reporting, it does not sufficiently capture rehabilitation-specific elements critical to understanding and optimising stroke recovery. Methods The TIDieR-Rehab checklist was developed using a modified Delphi methodology aligned with EQUATOR Network guidance. Rehabilitation experts (n=35) from 10 countries participated in online surveys. Quantitative consensus was assessed using Likert-scale agreement, while qualitative feedback was analysed using conventional content analysis. Findings were triangulated and overseen by an interdisciplinary Steering Committee to iteratively refine checklist items and produce a supplementary manual with reporting guidance and examples. Results Consensus was achieved after two Delphi rounds. The final TIDieR-Rehab checklist comprises 22 items: seven original TIDieR items, three adapted items, and 12 new items specific to rehabilitation. Key enhancements include explicit reporting of the target population; detailed specification of rehabilitation dosage, including amount, challenge, and progression or regression; person-centred tailoring to needs and preferences; and negative or undesired effects. Since publication, TIDieR-Rehab has been cited in rehabilitation intervention trials and incorporated into evidence syntheses and methodological guidance, supporting improved specification and appraisal of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Conclusions The TIDieR-Rehab checklist provides a structured, stroke-relevant framework for reporting of rehabilitation interventions. Early uptake across trials and evidence syntheses indicates its potential to improve reporting quality, strengthen interpretation of stroke recovery research, and support translation into clinical practice. Conflict of interest Nada Signal: Nothing to disclose. Emma Gomes: Nothing to disclose. Gemma Alder: Nothing to disclose. Sharon Olsen: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1063
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2314 STRENGTHENING STROKE RECOVERY RESEARCH THROUGH IMPROVED REHABILITATION INTERVENTION REPORTING: THE TIDIER-REHAB CHECKLIST

Emma Gomes, Sharon Olsen, Nada Signal, Gemma Alder
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2314 STRENGTHENING STROKE RECOVERY RESEARCH THROUGH IMPROVED REHABILITATION INTERVENTION REPORTING: THE TIDIER-REHAB CHECKLIST

Emma Gomes, Sharon Olsen, Nada Signal, Gemma Alder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Stroke rehabilitation interventions are complex, multi-component, and highly individualised. Inadequate reporting of intervention content, dosage, and personalisation remains a major barrier to replication, evidence synthesis, and translation into clinical practice. Although the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist supports general intervention reporting, it does not sufficiently capture rehabilitation-specific elements critical to understanding and optimising stroke recovery. Methods The TIDieR-Rehab checklist was developed using a modified Delphi methodology aligned with EQUATOR Network guidance. Rehabilitation experts (n=35) from 10 countries participated in online surveys. Quantitative consensus was assessed using Likert-scale agreement, while qualitative feedback was analysed using conventional content analysis. Findings were triangulated and overseen by an interdisciplinary Steering Committee to iteratively refine checklist items and produce a supplementary manual with reporting guidance and examples. Results Consensus was achieved after two Delphi rounds. The final TIDieR-Rehab checklist comprises 22 items: seven original TIDieR items, three adapted items, and 12 new items specific to rehabilitation. Key enhancements include explicit reporting of the target population; detailed specification of rehabilitation dosage, including amount, challenge, and progression or regression; person-centred tailoring to needs and preferences; and negative or undesired effects. Since publication, TIDieR-Rehab has been cited in rehabilitation intervention trials and incorporated into evidence syntheses and methodological guidance, supporting improved specification and appraisal of stroke rehabilitation interventions. Conclusions The TIDieR-Rehab checklist provides a structured, stroke-relevant framework for reporting of rehabilitation interventions. Early uptake across trials and evidence syntheses indicates its potential to improve reporting quality, strengthen interpretation of stroke recovery research, and support translation into clinical practice. Conflict of interest Nada Signal: Nothing to disclose. Emma Gomes: Nothing to disclose. Gemma Alder: Nothing to disclose. Sharon Olsen: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.