ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1261 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF DELAY IN GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT IN ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS

Abstract Background and aims Gastrostomy tube placement is recommended for acute stroke patients with persistent dysphagia, yet delays between decision and procedure are common, leading to prolonged hospitalization and delayed rehabilitation. This study aims to determine the proportion of stroke patients experiencing delayed gastrostomy tube placement and factors associated with these delays. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive acute stroke patients who underwent PEG placement during hospitalization over a two-year period. Patients were categorized as non-delayed (≤48 hours) or delayed (>48 hours) based on interval between determination of need and procedure. Demographics, stroke characteristics, hospital length of stay, number of speech-language pathology (SLP) sessions, causes of delay, and discharge disposition were analyzed. Results Of 84 patients, 43 (51.8%) experienced delayed PEG placement (mean delay 4.8 ± 2.0 days). Weekend or holiday scheduling (46.5%) and antiplatelet therapy discontinuation (mean delay 6.5 ± 2.3 days) were the most common causes. Family hesitation accounted for 11.6% of delays (mean 5.6 ± 0.9 days). Patients with delayed placement had longer hospital stays (29.6 ± 14.7 vs. 24.0 ± 11.8 days, p = 0.06) and were less frequently discharged to rehabilitation (27.9% vs. 40.0%) compared with non-delayed patients. Delayed placement was associated with a higher proportion of discharge to long-term acute care (23.3% vs. 17.5%) or hospice/in-hospital death (21.0% vs. 12.5%). Conclusions We found that over half of acute stroke patients who are recommended for gastrostomy tube placement experience a delay in receiving the procedure with weekend scheduling and need for discontinuing antiplatelet agents as major contributors to the observed delay. Conflict of interest Gunjanpreet Kaur: Nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1530
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1261 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF DELAY IN GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT IN ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS

Hatem Tolba, Gunjanpreet Kaur, Brandi French, Alibay Jafarli et al.
European Stroke Journal
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1261 CRITICAL EVALUATION OF DELAY IN GASTROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT IN ACUTE STROKE PATIENTS

Hatem Tolba, Gunjanpreet Kaur, Brandi French, Alibay Jafarli, Camilo Gomez, Vikram Kaur, Nived Ranjini, Adnan Qureshi, Syed Gillani
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Gastrostomy tube placement is recommended for acute stroke patients with persistent dysphagia, yet delays between decision and procedure are common, leading to prolonged hospitalization and delayed rehabilitation. This study aims to determine the proportion of stroke patients experiencing delayed gastrostomy tube placement and factors associated with these delays. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 84 consecutive acute stroke patients who underwent PEG placement during hospitalization over a two-year period. Patients were categorized as non-delayed (≤48 hours) or delayed (>48 hours) based on interval between determination of need and procedure. Demographics, stroke characteristics, hospital length of stay, number of speech-language pathology (SLP) sessions, causes of delay, and discharge disposition were analyzed. Results Of 84 patients, 43 (51.8%) experienced delayed PEG placement (mean delay 4.8 ± 2.0 days). Weekend or holiday scheduling (46.5%) and antiplatelet therapy discontinuation (mean delay 6.5 ± 2.3 days) were the most common causes. Family hesitation accounted for 11.6% of delays (mean 5.6 ± 0.9 days). Patients with delayed placement had longer hospital stays (29.6 ± 14.7 vs. 24.0 ± 11.8 days, p = 0.06) and were less frequently discharged to rehabilitation (27.9% vs. 40.0%) compared with non-delayed patients. Delayed placement was associated with a higher proportion of discharge to long-term acute care (23.3% vs. 17.5%) or hospice/in-hospital death (21.0% vs. 12.5%). Conclusions We found that over half of acute stroke patients who are recommended for gastrostomy tube placement experience a delay in receiving the procedure with weekend scheduling and need for discontinuing antiplatelet agents as major contributors to the observed delay. Conflict of interest Gunjanpreet Kaur: Nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.