ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1009 HOW TO COMBINE MULTIPLE ADVANCEMENTS IN STROKE TRIAL DESIGN: A CASE STUDY OF THE MSU TELEMEDICINE TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims Advanced trial design features are increasingly used in stroke. The MSU Telemedicine trial is a recent example, demonstrating that on a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU), a telemedicine model of care improved resource efficiency with minimal delays in clinical decision-making and no difference in safety. We provide an in-depth discussion of how advanced trial design features can be combined to effectively address research questions in stroke, using MSU Telemedicine as a case study. Methods MSU Telemedicine was a covariate-adjusted, cluster-randomised clinical trial with the Win Odds as its primary outcome measure. It had three key features: use of the “Win Odds” to address a multifaceted research question; covariate-adaptive randomisation to prospectively balance prognostic covariates; and a cluster-randomised design, which facilitated randomisation at the daily level, as individual participant randomisation was impractical. Results MSU Telemedicine achieved this combination of features by applying a novel modification to Simon and Pocock’s Biased Coin Algorithm that balanced the number of participants seen by nurses with different levels of experience using the anticipated number of participants that would be seen each day. To account for this randomisation procedure, p-values for the Win Odds were estimated using re-randomisation tests in accordance with FDA guidelines on adaptive randomisation, while confidence intervals were estimated using clustered bootstrap that accounted for daily clustering. Conclusions The combined use of advanced trial design features equips stroke researchers to improve stroke care. This combined approach is achievable in practice, as evidenced by the MSU Telemedicine Trial. Conflict of interest HJ: Nothing to disclose. VY: Nothing to disclose. AB: Nothing to disclose. BC: Nothing to disclose. SD: Nothing to disclose. GD: Nothing to disclose. LC: Nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.512
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1009 HOW TO COMBINE MULTIPLE ADVANCEMENTS IN STROKE TRIAL DESIGN: A CASE STUDY OF THE MSU TELEMEDICINE TRIAL

H. D. Johns, Anna Balabanski, Bruce C V Campbell, Stephen Davis et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1009 HOW TO COMBINE MULTIPLE ADVANCEMENTS IN STROKE TRIAL DESIGN: A CASE STUDY OF THE MSU TELEMEDICINE TRIAL

H. D. Johns, Anna Balabanski, Bruce C V Campbell, Stephen Davis, Vignan Yogendrakumar, Geoffrey A Donnan, Leonid Churilov
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Advanced trial design features are increasingly used in stroke. The MSU Telemedicine trial is a recent example, demonstrating that on a Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU), a telemedicine model of care improved resource efficiency with minimal delays in clinical decision-making and no difference in safety. We provide an in-depth discussion of how advanced trial design features can be combined to effectively address research questions in stroke, using MSU Telemedicine as a case study. Methods MSU Telemedicine was a covariate-adjusted, cluster-randomised clinical trial with the Win Odds as its primary outcome measure. It had three key features: use of the “Win Odds” to address a multifaceted research question; covariate-adaptive randomisation to prospectively balance prognostic covariates; and a cluster-randomised design, which facilitated randomisation at the daily level, as individual participant randomisation was impractical. Results MSU Telemedicine achieved this combination of features by applying a novel modification to Simon and Pocock’s Biased Coin Algorithm that balanced the number of participants seen by nurses with different levels of experience using the anticipated number of participants that would be seen each day. To account for this randomisation procedure, p-values for the Win Odds were estimated using re-randomisation tests in accordance with FDA guidelines on adaptive randomisation, while confidence intervals were estimated using clustered bootstrap that accounted for daily clustering. Conclusions The combined use of advanced trial design features equips stroke researchers to improve stroke care. This combined approach is achievable in practice, as evidenced by the MSU Telemedicine Trial. Conflict of interest HJ: Nothing to disclose. VY: Nothing to disclose. AB: Nothing to disclose. BC: Nothing to disclose. SD: Nothing to disclose. GD: Nothing to disclose. LC: Nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance (AU)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.