Abortion, incommunicability, and semiotic labor: Policing disciplinary boundaries through language ideological work among emergency nurses in a post‐Roe environment

Abstract Nurses working in emergency departments in the United States are increasingly managing obstetric emergencies, yet they receive no guidance from hospital administrators about how to adapt this care to the abortion bans that have recently become law in many states. Our interview‐based study explores reports of workplace communication about abortion among emergency nurses, which is constrained by an institutional language ideology prohibiting “political” talk. We trace how nurses respond to this prohibition through semiotic labor which nevertheless reinforces the boundary work that this language ideology maintains. Ultimately, this language ideology produces experiences of profound incommunicability for emergency nurses, isolating them from one another, negatively impacting their ability to care for their patients, and causing moral distress. In a time of rising authoritarianism and fascism, where talk about politics is both increasingly dangerous and vital to protect democracy, this study sheds light on the far‐reaching consequences of silencing political talk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.70056
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abortion, incommunicability, and semiotic labor: Policing disciplinary boundaries through language ideological work among emergency nurses in a post‐Roe environment

Lynnette Arnold, Lisa Wolf, Hannah Noblewolf
Journal of Linguistic Anthropology
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Abortion, incommunicability, and semiotic labor: Policing disciplinary boundaries through language ideological work among emergency nurses in a post‐Roe environment

Lynnette Arnold, Lisa Wolf, Hannah Noblewolf
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nurses working in emergency departments in the United States are increasingly managing obstetric emergencies, yet they receive no guidance from hospital administrators about how to adapt this care to the abortion bans that have recently become law in many states. Our interview‐based study explores reports of workplace communication about abortion among emergency nurses, which is constrained by an institutional language ideology prohibiting “political” talk. We trace how nurses respond to this prohibition through semiotic labor which nevertheless reinforces the boundary work that this language ideology maintains. Ultimately, this language ideology produces experiences of profound incommunicability for emergency nurses, isolating them from one another, negatively impacting their ability to care for their patients, and causing moral distress. In a time of rising authoritarianism and fascism, where talk about politics is both increasingly dangerous and vital to protect democracy, this study sheds light on the far‐reaching consequences of silencing political talk.

Journal of Linguistic AnthropologyVol. 36(1)
Albany State University (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.