ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A6 DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY UTILIZATION IN POINT-ELIGIBLE PATIENTS WITH NON-CARDIOEMBOLIC ISCHEMIC STROKE

Abstract Background and aims Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a cornerstone in secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke with NIHSS scores of ≤3, but the utilization of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients in clinical practice remains poorly elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the administration of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients, how the POINT publication influenced the use of DAPT, and which factors predict the use of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients after publication in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective, 10-year single-center cohort study including adults with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke admitted to a Swiss tertiary hospital between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified based on original POINT trial criteria. Logistic regression was used to visualize predicted probabilities of receiving DAPT by POINT-eligibility and discharge date, and to identify predictors of DAPT use in POINT-eligible patients. Results Overall, 29.2% received DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel at any time during hospitalization, while 17.5% were newly started on DAPT during hospitalisation and discharged with it. Among all patients, 54.5% met the POINT-eligibility criteria. DAPT use in POINT-eligible patients increased from 15.1% to 43.3% (p<0.001) after POINT publication. A substantial proportion of POINT-eligible patients (76.1%) did not receive DAPT. Prior aspirin use was associated with a lower likelihood of DAPT administration (aOR 0.010, 95%CI 0.001-0.106). Conclusions Every second patient with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke met the POINT criteria, yet DAPT remained underused despite increased utilization after the publication of POINT. Prior aspirin use was strongly associated with a lower likelihood of DAPT administration, although it should not preclude patients from receiving DAPT when otherwise eligible. Conflict of interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.165
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A6 DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY UTILIZATION IN POINT-ELIGIBLE PATIENTS WITH NON-CARDIOEMBOLIC ISCHEMIC STROKE

Thomas Schneider, Francesco Valletta, Sruthy Pereppadan, Shania Brülisauer et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A6 DUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPY UTILIZATION IN POINT-ELIGIBLE PATIENTS WITH NON-CARDIOEMBOLIC ISCHEMIC STROKE

Thomas Schneider, Francesco Valletta, Sruthy Pereppadan, Shania Brülisauer, Tolga Dittrich, Sabrina Schärli, Dimitrios Vlachos, Gian Marco De Marchis
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is a cornerstone in secondary prevention of non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke with NIHSS scores of ≤3, but the utilization of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients in clinical practice remains poorly elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the administration of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients, how the POINT publication influenced the use of DAPT, and which factors predict the use of DAPT in POINT-eligible patients after publication in clinical practice. Methods Retrospective, 10-year single-center cohort study including adults with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke admitted to a Swiss tertiary hospital between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified based on original POINT trial criteria. Logistic regression was used to visualize predicted probabilities of receiving DAPT by POINT-eligibility and discharge date, and to identify predictors of DAPT use in POINT-eligible patients. Results Overall, 29.2% received DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel at any time during hospitalization, while 17.5% were newly started on DAPT during hospitalisation and discharged with it. Among all patients, 54.5% met the POINT-eligibility criteria. DAPT use in POINT-eligible patients increased from 15.1% to 43.3% (p<0.001) after POINT publication. A substantial proportion of POINT-eligible patients (76.1%) did not receive DAPT. Prior aspirin use was associated with a lower likelihood of DAPT administration (aOR 0.010, 95%CI 0.001-0.106). Conclusions Every second patient with non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke met the POINT criteria, yet DAPT remained underused despite increased utilization after the publication of POINT. Prior aspirin use was strongly associated with a lower likelihood of DAPT administration, although it should not preclude patients from receiving DAPT when otherwise eligible. Conflict of interest All authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this study.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.