Climate performance of shared e scooters in Dubai: An attributional life cycle assessment and scenario-based implications

Shared electric scooters (e-scooters) are widely promoted as a low-carbon urban transport solution. However, their environmental impact depends on lifespan, operations, and modal shift. This study evaluates life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shared e-scooters operating in Dubai, UAE. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment is conducted, considering manufacturing, transportation, use phase electricity, redistribution logistics, and end-of-life treatment through scenario analysis varying lifetime distance (500, 1500, and 5000 km), riding energy intensity (10, 15, and 20 Wh/km), redistribution rate (10% and 50%), and disposal pathways (landfill versus high-recovery recycling). Emissions are then combined with modal shift assumptions to estimate net impacts relative to replaced transport modes. Manufacturing dominates the carbon footprint, contributing 144 kg CO 2 e per-e-scooter. Lifetime distance is the key determinant of per-km emissions, ranging from 262–483 g CO 2 e/km at 500 km, decline at 1500 km, and dropping to 63 g CO 2 e/km at 5000 km, allowing meaningful reductions when replacing short car trips. Variation in riding electricity intensity changes emissions by 5–8 g CO 2 e/km, indicating a minor contribution. In contrast, intensive redistribution can increase emissions by 140–145 g CO 2 e/km, making it the dominant operational contributor. Scenario-based net impact analysis shows that shared e-scooters do not inherently reduce emissions. They increase transport emissions when service lifetimes are short and substitution is dominated by walking. Shared e-scooters are therefore conditionally low-carbon, and their climate benefits depend on extended service lifetimes, optimized fleet management, material recovery, and policies that ensure car trip replacement. Otherwise, they risk increasing overall transport-related emissions. • E-scooters are conditionally low carbon, not inherently. • E-scooters service life governs GHG performance. • Manufacturing drives cradle to gate emissions. • Redistribution logistics dominate use phase emissions. • Service life, rebalancing, and car replacement are keys to climate gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.grets.2026.100408
Primary Topic
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate performance of shared e scooters in Dubai: An attributional life cycle assessment and scenario-based implications

Pengxiang Zhao, Charitha Dias, Anugrah Ilahi, Khaled Alawadi et al.
Green Technologies and Sustainability
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
article

Climate performance of shared e scooters in Dubai: An attributional life cycle assessment and scenario-based implications

Pengxiang Zhao, Charitha Dias, Anugrah Ilahi, Khaled Alawadi, Haider Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

Shared electric scooters (e-scooters) are widely promoted as a low-carbon urban transport solution. However, their environmental impact depends on lifespan, operations, and modal shift. This study evaluates life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shared e-scooters operating in Dubai, UAE. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment is conducted, considering manufacturing, transportation, use phase electricity, redistribution logistics, and end-of-life treatment through scenario analysis varying lifetime distance (500, 1500, and 5000 km), riding energy intensity (10, 15, and 20 Wh/km), redistribution rate (10% and 50%), and disposal pathways (landfill versus high-recovery recycling). Emissions are then combined with modal shift assumptions to estimate net impacts relative to replaced transport modes. Manufacturing dominates the carbon footprint, contributing 144 kg CO 2 e per-e-scooter. Lifetime distance is the key determinant of per-km emissions, ranging from 262–483 g CO 2 e/km at 500 km, decline at 1500 km, and dropping to 63 g CO 2 e/km at 5000 km, allowing meaningful reductions when replacing short car trips. Variation in riding electricity intensity changes emissions by 5–8 g CO 2 e/km, indicating a minor contribution. In contrast, intensive redistribution can increase emissions by 140–145 g CO 2 e/km, making it the dominant operational contributor. Scenario-based net impact analysis shows that shared e-scooters do not inherently reduce emissions. They increase transport emissions when service lifetimes are short and substitution is dominated by walking. Shared e-scooters are therefore conditionally low-carbon, and their climate benefits depend on extended service lifetimes, optimized fleet management, material recovery, and policies that ensure car trip replacement. Otherwise, they risk increasing overall transport-related emissions. • E-scooters are conditionally low carbon, not inherently. • E-scooters service life governs GHG performance. • Manufacturing drives cradle to gate emissions. • Redistribution logistics dominate use phase emissions. • Service life, rebalancing, and car replacement are keys to climate gains.

Green Technologies and Sustainability
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE), Lund University (SE)
Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.