ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1776 INVOLVING STROKE SURVIVORS AS ACTOR IN RESEARCH: LESSON FROM THE NAVISTROKE TRIAL EXPERIENCE

Abstract Background and aims Stroke survivors and their caregivers face lack of support and information increasing their psychosocial burden. We developed and evaluated the Navistroke post-stroke transition program to improve post-stroke participation. We aimed to test the feasibility of involving stroke survivors and caregivers and describe the process and the impact on research. Methods The project was underpinned by the Medical Research Council guidance and the Montreal model for patient engagement. It comprised 3 steps with increasing levels of involvement. Step1 followed a user centered design approach to codesign the intervention through workshops and consultations to test early prototypes. Step2 involved a feasibility study using consultation method to assess acceptability. Step3 assessed the impact of the program, in collaboration with a patient committee that guided the key methodological choices and overall project direction. Results The involvement levels of stroke survivors evolved across the 3 steps. In step 1, 6 stroke survivors and 6 caregivers fully co-designed the intervention to ensure that it reflected post-discharge needs. In step 2, 15 stroke survivors and 5 caregivers shared their experiences to refine the intervention and research project. In step 3, involvement shifted to co-decision, with the creation of a patient committee reviewing study outcomes, guiding measurement choices, and informing intervention delivery. Conclusions Stroke survivor involvement is feasible and valuable at every stage of a research project and should be actively considered by researchers. Although continuous involvement can be challenging, using different levels of engagement offers feasible ways to meaningfully integrate patients throughout the process. Conflict of interest Marion Delvallée: nothing to disclose; Mathilde Marchal: nothing to disclose; Anne Termoz: nothing to disclose; Ouazna Habchi: nothing to disclose; Laurent Derex: nothing to disclose; Anne-Marie Schott: nothing to disclose; Julie Haesebaert: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.831
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1776 INVOLVING STROKE SURVIVORS AS ACTOR IN RESEARCH: LESSON FROM THE NAVISTROKE TRIAL EXPERIENCE

Anne Termoz, Laurent Derex, Mathilde Marchal, Julie Haesebaert et al.
European Stroke Journal
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1776 INVOLVING STROKE SURVIVORS AS ACTOR IN RESEARCH: LESSON FROM THE NAVISTROKE TRIAL EXPERIENCE

Anne Termoz, Laurent Derex, Mathilde Marchal, Julie Haesebaert, Anne‐Marie Schott, Ouazna Habchi, Marion Delvallée
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Stroke survivors and their caregivers face lack of support and information increasing their psychosocial burden. We developed and evaluated the Navistroke post-stroke transition program to improve post-stroke participation. We aimed to test the feasibility of involving stroke survivors and caregivers and describe the process and the impact on research. Methods The project was underpinned by the Medical Research Council guidance and the Montreal model for patient engagement. It comprised 3 steps with increasing levels of involvement. Step1 followed a user centered design approach to codesign the intervention through workshops and consultations to test early prototypes. Step2 involved a feasibility study using consultation method to assess acceptability. Step3 assessed the impact of the program, in collaboration with a patient committee that guided the key methodological choices and overall project direction. Results The involvement levels of stroke survivors evolved across the 3 steps. In step 1, 6 stroke survivors and 6 caregivers fully co-designed the intervention to ensure that it reflected post-discharge needs. In step 2, 15 stroke survivors and 5 caregivers shared their experiences to refine the intervention and research project. In step 3, involvement shifted to co-decision, with the creation of a patient committee reviewing study outcomes, guiding measurement choices, and informing intervention delivery. Conclusions Stroke survivor involvement is feasible and valuable at every stage of a research project and should be actively considered by researchers. Although continuous involvement can be challenging, using different levels of engagement offers feasible ways to meaningfully integrate patients throughout the process. Conflict of interest Marion Delvallée: nothing to disclose; Mathilde Marchal: nothing to disclose; Anne Termoz: nothing to disclose; Ouazna Habchi: nothing to disclose; Laurent Derex: nothing to disclose; Anne-Marie Schott: nothing to disclose; Julie Haesebaert: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Inserm (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Hôpital Pierre Wertheimer (FR), Health Services and Performance Research Laboratory (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.