ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1375 ELEVATED LEG POSITIONING FOR ACUTE MODERATE ISCHEMIC STROKE: THE LEG-UP PILOT STUDY

Abstract Background and aims Optimization of cerebral perfusion through nonpharmacological hemodynamic interventions, particularly patient positioning, has shown promise as a cost-effective strategy for improving acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes; however, current evidence remains inconsistent. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit of elevated leg positioning (ELP) in AIS. Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label, and blinded-endpoint pilot study included moderate anterior circulation AIS patients with probable large artery atherosclerosis etiology who were ineligible for reperfusion therapy. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 30° ELP initiated within 24 hours of ictus, or standard care. Primary endpoints were intervention feasibility and safety, assessed by protocol adherence and the frequency of prespecified positioning-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were 90-day favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score: 0-2), and 30-day all-cause mortality. Results Fifty patients were randomized (n=25 per group). Protocol adherence was 96.0% (24/25) in the intervention group, with one patient unable to tolerate ELP. Three patients (6.0%) were lost to follow-up. Prespecified adverse events occurred in 4.2% (1/24) of the intervention group and 8.0% (2/25) of the control group; no serious adverse events observed. Favorable functional outcome at 90 days occurred in 62.5% (14/24) in the intervention group versus 47.8% (11/23) in the control group; 30-day mortality was 8.3% (2/24) versus 13.0% (3/23), respectively. Conclusions ELP was feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in moderate anterior circulation AIS; observed trends in functional outcomes and survival provide preliminary indications of benefit, supporting further evaluation in a definitive randomized trial. Conflict of interest Bonifacio C. Pedregosa II, MD: nothing to disclose. Jose C. Navarro, MD, MSc: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.659
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1375 ELEVATED LEG POSITIONING FOR ACUTE MODERATE ISCHEMIC STROKE: THE LEG-UP PILOT STUDY

Jose Navarro, Bonifacio Ii Pedregosa
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1375 ELEVATED LEG POSITIONING FOR ACUTE MODERATE ISCHEMIC STROKE: THE LEG-UP PILOT STUDY

Jose Navarro, Bonifacio Ii Pedregosa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Optimization of cerebral perfusion through nonpharmacological hemodynamic interventions, particularly patient positioning, has shown promise as a cost-effective strategy for improving acute ischemic stroke (AIS) outcomes; however, current evidence remains inconsistent. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and potential clinical benefit of elevated leg positioning (ELP) in AIS. Methods This prospective, randomized, open-label, and blinded-endpoint pilot study included moderate anterior circulation AIS patients with probable large artery atherosclerosis etiology who were ineligible for reperfusion therapy. Eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 30° ELP initiated within 24 hours of ictus, or standard care. Primary endpoints were intervention feasibility and safety, assessed by protocol adherence and the frequency of prespecified positioning-related adverse events. Secondary endpoints were 90-day favorable functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score: 0-2), and 30-day all-cause mortality. Results Fifty patients were randomized (n=25 per group). Protocol adherence was 96.0% (24/25) in the intervention group, with one patient unable to tolerate ELP. Three patients (6.0%) were lost to follow-up. Prespecified adverse events occurred in 4.2% (1/24) of the intervention group and 8.0% (2/25) of the control group; no serious adverse events observed. Favorable functional outcome at 90 days occurred in 62.5% (14/24) in the intervention group versus 47.8% (11/23) in the control group; 30-day mortality was 8.3% (2/24) versus 13.0% (3/23), respectively. Conclusions ELP was feasible and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in moderate anterior circulation AIS; observed trends in functional outcomes and survival provide preliminary indications of benefit, supporting further evaluation in a definitive randomized trial. Conflict of interest Bonifacio C. Pedregosa II, MD: nothing to disclose. Jose C. Navarro, MD, MSc: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
José R. Reyes Memorial Medical Center (PH), University of Santo Tomas (PH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.