SΔϕ-58 — Cost Attribution Symmetry Index: Group Cost Attribution, Exit Cost, Dissent Cost, Repair Burden, and Capture Risk (v1.0, AI-Readable Package)

SΔϕ-58 introduces the Cost Attribution Symmetry Index (CASI) within the Sofience–Δϕ Formalism Series. The central claim is that a group is not evaluated first by its declared values, ideology, orthodoxy, mission, sacredness, popularity, sincerity, or moral label. A group is audited by how it attributes benefit, sacrifice, repair burden, dissent cost, exit cost, and interpretive authority. This AI-readable package decomposes the canonical SΔϕ-58 paper into operational files for AI ingestion, group cost attribution audit, citation, and reproducible evaluation. It includes the canonical paper, core declaration, AI quickstart, minimal prompt, CASI schema, cost attribution axes, cost symmetry rubric, external/internal audit comparison, exit/dissent/repair cost test, power capture and leader benefit test, group/religion/politics/company module, labeling risk and do-not-call-it-cult rule, output templates, do-not-use conditions, failure modes, relation map, metadata, citation file, DOI references, license, and manifest. CASI evaluates how cost and benefit are distributed across a group. It asks who receives benefit, who bears sacrifice, who performs repair, who absorbs failure, who is blamed when the system fails, who can dissent, who can exit, who controls interpretation, and who can audit the cost attribution. A group becomes structurally risky when benefit concentrates upward while cost, repair, silence, loyalty, guilt, and exit burden are pushed downward. The framework is not a cult label generator, legal judgment, theological truth detector, political ideology classifier, proof of bad intent, or replacement for investigation. It is intended to reduce premature labeling by replacing labels with specific cost-attribution signals such as high exit cost, high dissent cost, leader/member cost asymmetry, downward repair burden, low auditability, and internal/external cost-map mismatch. The package is intended for group cost attribution audit, religious group analysis, political movement analysis, company and workplace audit, online community analysis, AI governance group evaluation, exit/dissent/repair cost mapping, external/internal audit comparison, and capture risk analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20059484
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SΔϕ-58 — Cost Attribution Symmetry Index: Group Cost Attribution, Exit Cost, Dissent Cost, Repair Burden, and Capture Risk (v1.0, AI-Readable Package)

Sofience
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Religion, Society, and Development
article

SΔϕ-58 — Cost Attribution Symmetry Index: Group Cost Attribution, Exit Cost, Dissent Cost, Repair Burden, and Capture Risk (v1.0, AI-Readable Package)

Sofience
article en

Abstract

SΔϕ-58 introduces the Cost Attribution Symmetry Index (CASI) within the Sofience–Δϕ Formalism Series. The central claim is that a group is not evaluated first by its declared values, ideology, orthodoxy, mission, sacredness, popularity, sincerity, or moral label. A group is audited by how it attributes benefit, sacrifice, repair burden, dissent cost, exit cost, and interpretive authority. This AI-readable package decomposes the canonical SΔϕ-58 paper into operational files for AI ingestion, group cost attribution audit, citation, and reproducible evaluation. It includes the canonical paper, core declaration, AI quickstart, minimal prompt, CASI schema, cost attribution axes, cost symmetry rubric, external/internal audit comparison, exit/dissent/repair cost test, power capture and leader benefit test, group/religion/politics/company module, labeling risk and do-not-call-it-cult rule, output templates, do-not-use conditions, failure modes, relation map, metadata, citation file, DOI references, license, and manifest. CASI evaluates how cost and benefit are distributed across a group. It asks who receives benefit, who bears sacrifice, who performs repair, who absorbs failure, who is blamed when the system fails, who can dissent, who can exit, who controls interpretation, and who can audit the cost attribution. A group becomes structurally risky when benefit concentrates upward while cost, repair, silence, loyalty, guilt, and exit burden are pushed downward. The framework is not a cult label generator, legal judgment, theological truth detector, political ideology classifier, proof of bad intent, or replacement for investigation. It is intended to reduce premature labeling by replacing labels with specific cost-attribution signals such as high exit cost, high dissent cost, leader/member cost asymmetry, downward repair burden, low auditability, and internal/external cost-map mismatch. The package is intended for group cost attribution audit, religious group analysis, political movement analysis, company and workplace audit, online community analysis, AI governance group evaluation, exit/dissent/repair cost mapping, external/internal audit comparison, and capture risk analysis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

SΔϕ-58 — Cost Attribution Symmetry Index: Group Cost Attribution, Exit Cost, Dissent Cost, Repair Burden, and Capture Risk (v1.0, AI-Readable Package) — Sofience · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS