ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2281 FOSTERING THE CLINICAL REASONING OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES IN THE CONTEXT OF STROKE CARE

Abstract Background and aims Since 2018, Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) have become new contributors to stroke care in France. They work in many clinical settings, and most are not part of neurovascular units. Yet they frequently support patients at risk of stroke or with a previous stroke. To practice safely and autonomously, APNs must develop a clear and structured clinical reasoning framework during their two-year university training. This need is even stronger as their role expands across the entire care pathway. Methods At Université Paris-Cité, a multidisciplinary team of physicians and APNs teaches stroke-related content in the second-year APN curriculum. Between October 2022 and January 2023, five APNs participated in monthly workshops. Their goal was to design a simple, accessible, and reproducible clinical reasoning model for APNs without neurovascular expertise. Feedback from a pilot cohort allowed the team to refine, clarify, and strengthen the model. Results The group developed a three-step framework: “Alert, Assess, Accompany.” It integrates biomedical knowledge with nursing sciences. Step 1 focuses on ruling out a neurovascular emergency (Alert). Step 2 examines control of stroke risk factors and, when relevant, the cause of the stroke (Assess). Step 3 evaluates functional autonomy and its impact on daily life, then guides APN-level interventions (Accompany). The model aims to support consistent and safe decision-making. Conclusions APN practice is expanding within a rapidly changing healthcare system. A shared and structured clinical reasoning model is essential. It supports this emerging profession and helps evaluate its contribution to stroke care pathways. Conflict of interest Boursin: nothing to disclose. Coutier: nothing to disclose. Da Silva Mendes: nothing to disclose. Pires Oliveira: nothing to disclose. Setnikar: nothing to disclose. Mazighi: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1784
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2281 FOSTERING THE CLINICAL REASONING OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES IN THE CONTEXT OF STROKE CARE

Séverine Coutier, Alexandra Setnikar, Sofia Da Silva Mendes, Helena Pires Oliveira et al.
European Stroke Journal
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2281 FOSTERING THE CLINICAL REASONING OF ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSES IN THE CONTEXT OF STROKE CARE

Séverine Coutier, Alexandra Setnikar, Sofia Da Silva Mendes, Helena Pires Oliveira, Mikael Mazighi, Perrine Boursin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Since 2018, Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) have become new contributors to stroke care in France. They work in many clinical settings, and most are not part of neurovascular units. Yet they frequently support patients at risk of stroke or with a previous stroke. To practice safely and autonomously, APNs must develop a clear and structured clinical reasoning framework during their two-year university training. This need is even stronger as their role expands across the entire care pathway. Methods At Université Paris-Cité, a multidisciplinary team of physicians and APNs teaches stroke-related content in the second-year APN curriculum. Between October 2022 and January 2023, five APNs participated in monthly workshops. Their goal was to design a simple, accessible, and reproducible clinical reasoning model for APNs without neurovascular expertise. Feedback from a pilot cohort allowed the team to refine, clarify, and strengthen the model. Results The group developed a three-step framework: “Alert, Assess, Accompany.” It integrates biomedical knowledge with nursing sciences. Step 1 focuses on ruling out a neurovascular emergency (Alert). Step 2 examines control of stroke risk factors and, when relevant, the cause of the stroke (Assess). Step 3 evaluates functional autonomy and its impact on daily life, then guides APN-level interventions (Accompany). The model aims to support consistent and safe decision-making. Conclusions APN practice is expanding within a rapidly changing healthcare system. A shared and structured clinical reasoning model is essential. It supports this emerging profession and helps evaluate its contribution to stroke care pathways. Conflict of interest Boursin: nothing to disclose. Coutier: nothing to disclose. Da Silva Mendes: nothing to disclose. Pires Oliveira: nothing to disclose. Setnikar: nothing to disclose. Mazighi: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Inserm (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Lariboisière (FR), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), Paris Cardiovascular Research Center (FR), Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph (FR), FHU Neurovasc (FR), Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.