ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A189 THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF MEASURING CIRCULATING GFAP IN SEVERE STROKE

Abstract Background and aims Stroke is a global health concern, requiring early and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. Differentiating between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke is critical, as treatment strategies differ significantly. While neuroimaging is the gold standard for differential diagnosis of stroke code patients, blood biomarkers could be a promising and cost-effective diagnostic method for earlier diagnosis in the prehospital setting, where neuroimaging is unavailable. Studies demonstrate that the biomarker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) can distinguish ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with high specificity, though sensitivity varies based on sampling timing and assay methodology. This narrative review explores the potential of GFAP as a diagnostic biomarkern severe strokes, and in identifying large vessel occlusions (LVOs). Methods We performed a narrative review by searching electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, to identify relevant articles published up to July 2025. The search used combinations of the keywords “glial fibrillary acidic protein”, “stroke”, “blood biomarker”, and “diagnosis”. Articles were screened for relevance based on title and abstract, followed by full-text review. Results While studies suggest a correlation between higher GFAP levels and stroke severity in hemorrhagic stroke, evidence for this in ischemic stroke is inconclusive. Combining GFAP with clinical stroke scales and additional biomarkers has shown promise in identifying LVO. Conclusions Future research should focus on refining the diagnostic role of GFAP in severe strokes, optimizing sample timing, and including large cohorts representing the full spectrum of stroke severities. Conflict of interest Megan Gjordeni: nothing to disclose. Jakob Pansell: nothing to disclose. Eric P. Thelin: nothing to disclose. Michael V. Mazya: nothing to disclose. Kaveh Pourhamidi: nothing to disclose. Perttu J. Lindsberg: nothing to disclose. Olli S. Mattila: nothing to disclose. Charith Cooray: nothing to disclose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1240
Primary Topic
S100 Proteins and Annexins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A189 THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF MEASURING CIRCULATING GFAP IN SEVERE STROKE

Kaveh Pourhamidi, Perttu J. Lindsberg, Jakob Pansell, Megan Gjordeni et al.
European Stroke Journal
S100 Proteins and Annexins
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A189 THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF MEASURING CIRCULATING GFAP IN SEVERE STROKE

Kaveh Pourhamidi, Perttu J. Lindsberg, Jakob Pansell, Megan Gjordeni, Eric Thelin, Olli Mattila, Charith Cooray, Michael Mazya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Stroke is a global health concern, requiring early and accurate diagnosis for effective treatment. Differentiating between ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke is critical, as treatment strategies differ significantly. While neuroimaging is the gold standard for differential diagnosis of stroke code patients, blood biomarkers could be a promising and cost-effective diagnostic method for earlier diagnosis in the prehospital setting, where neuroimaging is unavailable. Studies demonstrate that the biomarker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) can distinguish ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke with high specificity, though sensitivity varies based on sampling timing and assay methodology. This narrative review explores the potential of GFAP as a diagnostic biomarkern severe strokes, and in identifying large vessel occlusions (LVOs). Methods We performed a narrative review by searching electronic databases, such as PubMed and Google Scholar, to identify relevant articles published up to July 2025. The search used combinations of the keywords “glial fibrillary acidic protein”, “stroke”, “blood biomarker”, and “diagnosis”. Articles were screened for relevance based on title and abstract, followed by full-text review. Results While studies suggest a correlation between higher GFAP levels and stroke severity in hemorrhagic stroke, evidence for this in ischemic stroke is inconclusive. Combining GFAP with clinical stroke scales and additional biomarkers has shown promise in identifying LVO. Conclusions Future research should focus on refining the diagnostic role of GFAP in severe strokes, optimizing sample timing, and including large cohorts representing the full spectrum of stroke severities. Conflict of interest Megan Gjordeni: nothing to disclose. Jakob Pansell: nothing to disclose. Eric P. Thelin: nothing to disclose. Michael V. Mazya: nothing to disclose. Kaveh Pourhamidi: nothing to disclose. Perttu J. Lindsberg: nothing to disclose. Olli S. Mattila: nothing to disclose. Charith Cooray: nothing to disclose.

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Karolinska University Hospital (SE), University of Helsinki (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
S100 Proteins and Annexins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.