ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A32 INTERPROFESSIONAL SHARED DECISION-MAKING: A STROKE REHABILITATION PATIENT PERSPECTIVE

Abstract Background and aims Interprofessional shared decision-making (IP-SDM) is a key process in developing stroke rehabilitation plans. It involves collaboration between the rehabilitation team, the patient, and family to ensure decisions are informed and aligned with patient's values and preferences. Active patient involvement, clear understanding of therapeutic goals, and knowledge of available options are essential. However, most studies on IP-SDM have been conducted in primary care and surgical contexts, while little evidence exists in stroke rehabilitation, where patients face multiple complex decisions. The aim of this study was to describe patient's perceptions of shared decision-making during development of rehabilitation plans. Methods A descriptive quantitative study, guided by Légaré’s IP-SDM model, was conducted with adult patients who had experienced a stroke. Data collection instruments included the CollaboRATE scale, the Role Assumed Questionnaire, the Decision Satisfaction Scale (SDM), and the SURE test. A descriptive analysis of the results was performed. Results Among the 25 participants, 68% of patients felt actively involved in the decision-making process, and 76% reported making decisions jointly with their rehabilitation team. Overall decision satisfaction was high, with 65% of participants strongly agreeing with all satisfaction items. Furthermore, 90% of patients reported no decisional conflict and confirmed their treatment plan. Conclusions Patients in post-stroke rehabilitation report being satisfied with the decisions made regarding their treatment plans. These findings highlight the importance of involving patients and their families in shared decision-making, in close collaboration with the rehabilitation team, to enhance treatment adherence, satisfaction, and overall health outcomes. Keywords: Interprofessional shared decision-making, rehabilitation, stroke. Conflict of interest "Noelle Audrey Moko Tatuene and Co-Authors: This study was funded by the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS) and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). All authors have nothing to disclose".