Mapping interdisciplinary teamwork in stroke across the care continuum: a rapid scoping review

Background: Interdisciplinary teamwork, delivered through multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), is widely recognised in high-quality stroke care. However, its definition, operationalisation and governance within clinical practice guidelines remain unclear. Aims: To map how guidelines describe the MDT and teamwork across stroke care. Methods: A rapid scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Documents were synthesised using the Donabedian framework, focusing on structural, process and implementation elements of interdisciplinary teamwork. Results: Some 21 documents were included (13 system-level and 8 topic-specific). Interdisciplinary teamwork was consistently endorsed and structurally embedded, particularly in stroke unit and rehabilitation models, but was primarily operationalised through task-based clinical processes rather than governed standardised multidisciplinary team structures. Leadership roles, co-ordination, ownership and measurable teamwork indicators were infrequently reported. Conclusions: A lack of Donabedian-aligned teamwork indicators constrains implementation, accountability and evaluation of interdisciplinary stroke care, particularly regarding nursing and allied health professional contributions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Published
2026-04-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjnn.2026.0015
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping interdisciplinary teamwork in stroke across the care continuum: a rapid scoping review

Marina Charalambous, Birgitte Hede Ebbesen, Lauren R. Hepworth, Hugo Bismuth et al.
British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Mapping interdisciplinary teamwork in stroke across the care continuum: a rapid scoping review

Marina Charalambous, Birgitte Hede Ebbesen, Lauren R. Hepworth, Hugo Bismuth, Marianne Elisabeth Klinke, Perrine Boursin, Tereza Koláčná, Cristiana Rago
article en

Abstract

Background: Interdisciplinary teamwork, delivered through multidisciplinary teams (MDTs), is widely recognised in high-quality stroke care. However, its definition, operationalisation and governance within clinical practice guidelines remain unclear. Aims: To map how guidelines describe the MDT and teamwork across stroke care. Methods: A rapid scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Documents were synthesised using the Donabedian framework, focusing on structural, process and implementation elements of interdisciplinary teamwork. Results: Some 21 documents were included (13 system-level and 8 topic-specific). Interdisciplinary teamwork was consistently endorsed and structurally embedded, particularly in stroke unit and rehabilitation models, but was primarily operationalised through task-based clinical processes rather than governed standardised multidisciplinary team structures. Leadership roles, co-ordination, ownership and measurable teamwork indicators were infrequently reported. Conclusions: A lack of Donabedian-aligned teamwork indicators constrains implementation, accountability and evaluation of interdisciplinary stroke care, particularly regarding nursing and allied health professional contributions.

British Journal of Neuroscience NursingVol. 22(2)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), University of Liverpool (GB), Cyprus University of Technology (CY), University of Iceland (IS), Université Paris Cité (FR), Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Sorbonne Université (FR), University Hospital in Motol (CZ), National University Hospital of Iceland (IS), Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR), Fondation de Rothschild (FR), FHU Neurovasc (FR), European Federation of Nurses Associations (BE), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.