ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2328 NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING IN ISCHEMIC STROKE TREATED WITH MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY—PROTECT-I TRIAL

Abstract Background and aims Endovascular treatment (EVT) improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO); however, more than half of patients still experience poor functional outcome. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), consisting of brief cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion, has shown neuroprotective effects in preclinical studies, but clinical evidence—particularly in the EVT setting—remains limited. We investigated whether RIC reduces final infarct volume expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion in AIS patients undergoing EVT. Methods PROTECT-I was a randomized, open-label, single-center trial with blinded endpoint assessment. AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for EVT were randomized (1:1) to RIC plus standard care or standard care alone. RIC consisted of four 5-minute cycles of upper-limb ischemia (200 mmHg) followed by reperfusion. MRI was performed at baseline and at Day 1. The primary outcome was final infarct volume on Day-1 diffusion-weighted imaging, expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion defined by Tmax≥6 s. Results The intention-to-treat population included 130 patients (mean age 72.6 ± 15 years; 55.4% male). Median final infarct volume relative to baseline perfusion lesion was 0.311 [0.135–0.565] in the RIC group and 0.278 [0.116–0.610] in the control group. After dichotomization at the median (0.298), RIC was not associated with reduced infarct volume (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.61–2.79; P = 0.50). Results remained nonsignificant after adjustment for final TICI score. Conclusions RIC did not reduce final infarct volume expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion in AIS patients treated with EVT. Conflict of interest Laura Mechtouff: nothing to disclose; Alexandre Bani-Sadr: nothing to disclose; Omer Faruk Eker: nothing to disclose; Julia Fontaine: nothing to disclose; Paul Clottes:: nothing to disclose; Baptiste Balanca: nothing to disclose; Yves Berthezene: nothing to disclose; Norbert Nighoghossian: nothing to disclose; Nathan Mewton: nothing to disclose; Tae-Hee Cho: nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.152
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2328 NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING IN ISCHEMIC STROKE TREATED WITH MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY—PROTECT-I TRIAL

Julia Fontaine, Baptiste Balança, Ömer EKER, Paul Clottes et al.
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A2328 NEUROPROTECTIVE EFFECT OF REMOTE ISCHEMIC CONDITIONING IN ISCHEMIC STROKE TREATED WITH MECHANICAL THROMBECTOMY—PROTECT-I TRIAL

Julia Fontaine, Baptiste Balança, Ömer EKER, Paul Clottes, Alexandre Bani-Sadr, Nathan Mewton, Tae-Hee Cho, Yves Berthezene, Laura Mechtouff, Norbert Nighoghossian
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Endovascular treatment (EVT) improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO); however, more than half of patients still experience poor functional outcome. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), consisting of brief cycles of limb ischemia and reperfusion, has shown neuroprotective effects in preclinical studies, but clinical evidence—particularly in the EVT setting—remains limited. We investigated whether RIC reduces final infarct volume expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion in AIS patients undergoing EVT. Methods PROTECT-I was a randomized, open-label, single-center trial with blinded endpoint assessment. AIS patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for EVT were randomized (1:1) to RIC plus standard care or standard care alone. RIC consisted of four 5-minute cycles of upper-limb ischemia (200 mmHg) followed by reperfusion. MRI was performed at baseline and at Day 1. The primary outcome was final infarct volume on Day-1 diffusion-weighted imaging, expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion defined by Tmax≥6 s. Results The intention-to-treat population included 130 patients (mean age 72.6 ± 15 years; 55.4% male). Median final infarct volume relative to baseline perfusion lesion was 0.311 [0.135–0.565] in the RIC group and 0.278 [0.116–0.610] in the control group. After dichotomization at the median (0.298), RIC was not associated with reduced infarct volume (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.61–2.79; P = 0.50). Results remained nonsignificant after adjustment for final TICI score. Conclusions RIC did not reduce final infarct volume expressed as a percentage of the baseline perfusion lesion in AIS patients treated with EVT. Conflict of interest Laura Mechtouff: nothing to disclose; Alexandre Bani-Sadr: nothing to disclose; Omer Faruk Eker: nothing to disclose; Julia Fontaine: nothing to disclose; Paul Clottes:: nothing to disclose; Baptiste Balanca: nothing to disclose; Yves Berthezene: nothing to disclose; Norbert Nighoghossian: nothing to disclose; Nathan Mewton: nothing to disclose; Tae-Hee Cho: nothing to disclose. Figure 1 - belongs to Conclusions

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.