Invasive versus non-invasive management in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with pulmonary hypertension

Background Non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) represents a substantial proportion of acute coronary syndrome and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes and may complicate management decisions in NSTEMI. However, evidence regarding the optimal treatment strategy for NSTEMI patients with PH remains limited. This study evaluated the association between invasive versus conservative management and short- and long-term outcomes in a real-world multicenter cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study used data from the Tianjin Health and Medical Big Data Super Platform. Adult patients hospitalized with NSTEMI and concomitant PH between January 2010 and March 2023 were included. Patients were categorized according to treatment strategy during the index hospitalization (invasive vs. conservative management). The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or repeat revascularization. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression. The primary analysis used inverse probability of treatment weighting with doubly robust Cox regression models, with additional sensitivity analyses. Results Among 985 patients with NSTEMI and PH, 243 (24.7%) received invasive management and 742 (75.3%) conservative treatment. In doubly robust Cox models, invasive management was associated with a lower risk of 1-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.88, P = 0.009) and cardiac death (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.87, P = 0.011). However, bleeding risk was higher in the invasive group (aHR 2.86, 95% CI 1.34–6.11, P = 0.007). Conclusion Invasive management was associated with fewer ischemic events but a higher risk of bleeding in patients with NSTEMI and PH, highlighting the need for individualized treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121261449544
Primary Topic
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Invasive versus non-invasive management in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with pulmonary hypertension

Weiding Wang, Sutao Hu, Xian Shao, Ze Zhang et al.
SAGE Open Medicine
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
article

Invasive versus non-invasive management in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with pulmonary hypertension

Weiding Wang, Sutao Hu, Xian Shao, Ze Zhang, Haonan Xu, Y K Zhang, X Liu, Tianshu Gu, Huaying Fu, Lin Wang, Yongjian Li, Kang-Yin Chen, Tong Liu
article en

Abstract

Background Non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) represents a substantial proportion of acute coronary syndrome and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes and may complicate management decisions in NSTEMI. However, evidence regarding the optimal treatment strategy for NSTEMI patients with PH remains limited. This study evaluated the association between invasive versus conservative management and short- and long-term outcomes in a real-world multicenter cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective multicenter cohort study used data from the Tianjin Health and Medical Big Data Super Platform. Adult patients hospitalized with NSTEMI and concomitant PH between January 2010 and March 2023 were included. Patients were categorized according to treatment strategy during the index hospitalization (invasive vs. conservative management). The primary outcome was 1-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or repeat revascularization. Propensity scores were estimated using logistic regression. The primary analysis used inverse probability of treatment weighting with doubly robust Cox regression models, with additional sensitivity analyses. Results Among 985 patients with NSTEMI and PH, 243 (24.7%) received invasive management and 742 (75.3%) conservative treatment. In doubly robust Cox models, invasive management was associated with a lower risk of 1-year MACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.88, P = 0.009) and cardiac death (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.87, P = 0.011). However, bleeding risk was higher in the invasive group (aHR 2.86, 95% CI 1.34–6.11, P = 0.007). Conclusion Invasive management was associated with fewer ischemic events but a higher risk of bleeding in patients with NSTEMI and PH, highlighting the need for individualized treatment strategies.

SAGE Open MedicineVol. 14
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University (CN), Tianjin Chest Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University (CN), Southern Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.