Development of a core screening, assessment and outcome set for cancer prehabilitation: an international Delphi consensus study protocol

INTRODUCTION: A core screening, assessment and outcome set is needed in cancer prehabilitation to standardise what is measured in both research and services. Currently, there is significant variation in measures used, which limits comparability between studies and evidence synthesis. Standardising measures will improve the quality, comparability and impact of research by reducing heterogeneity between studies, minimising reporting bias, improving trial efficiency, enabling data synthesis into large datasets, supporting international collaboration and data sharing, and accelerating the implementation of best practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international Delphi consensus process will be conducted involving patients, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and their corresponding measurement instruments, to be included in a core set. The study consists of three phases: (1) A scoping review to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and associated measurement instruments currently used in cancer prehabilitation. (2) At least two rounds of a modified Delphi survey to prioritise the identified screening, assessment and outcomes using a 1-9 Likert scale. Consensus will be defined across stakeholder groups using prespecified thresholds. A consensus meeting will be held if agreement is not reached. (3) Measurement instruments corresponding to each retained screening, assessment and outcome will be assessed for quality for measurement properties and feasibility. Further Delphi rounds will be conducted to reach consensus on the most appropriate measurement instrument for each core screening, assessment and outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval (Ref: 25/NW/0159). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder networks and made publicly available via the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116442
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of a core screening, assessment and outcome set for cancer prehabilitation: an international Delphi consensus study protocol

Liam Humphreys, Carol Keen, Thomas Parkington, Lara Edbrooke et al.
BMJ Open
Delphi Technique in Research
article

Development of a core screening, assessment and outcome set for cancer prehabilitation: an international Delphi consensus study protocol

Liam Humphreys, Carol Keen, Thomas Parkington, Lara Edbrooke, Neil Garner, John Moore, Linda Denehy, Anna Myers, bart bongers, Robert Copeland, Gerrit D Slooter, Daniel Steffens, Karen Nile, Malcolm West, Chelsia Gillis
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A core screening, assessment and outcome set is needed in cancer prehabilitation to standardise what is measured in both research and services. Currently, there is significant variation in measures used, which limits comparability between studies and evidence synthesis. Standardising measures will improve the quality, comparability and impact of research by reducing heterogeneity between studies, minimising reporting bias, improving trial efficiency, enabling data synthesis into large datasets, supporting international collaboration and data sharing, and accelerating the implementation of best practices. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An international Delphi consensus process will be conducted involving patients, healthcare professionals and researchers to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and their corresponding measurement instruments, to be included in a core set. The study consists of three phases: (1) A scoping review to identify screening, assessment and outcomes and associated measurement instruments currently used in cancer prehabilitation. (2) At least two rounds of a modified Delphi survey to prioritise the identified screening, assessment and outcomes using a 1-9 Likert scale. Consensus will be defined across stakeholder groups using prespecified thresholds. A consensus meeting will be held if agreement is not reached. (3) Measurement instruments corresponding to each retained screening, assessment and outcome will be assessed for quality for measurement properties and feasibility. Further Delphi rounds will be conducted to reach consensus on the most appropriate measurement instrument for each core screening, assessment and outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has ethical approval (Ref: 25/NW/0159). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, stakeholder networks and made publicly available via the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials database.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(5)
Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), The University of Sydney (AU), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), The University of Melbourne (AU), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Yorkshire Cancer Research (GB), Maastricht University (NL), Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL), University of Southampton (GB), McGill University (CA), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Royal Marsden Cancer Charity
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.