ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1005 OUTCOME OF REPERFUSION THERAPIES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE OF AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS

Abstract Background and aims Reperfusion therapies, including intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and combined bridging therapy, have significantly improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. However, comparative real-world data from developing countries remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes associated with different reperfusion strategies in an Egyptian tertiary stroke center. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of 237 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated at Al-Azhar University Hospitals. The cohort included approximately 140 males and 97 females, aged 32 to 85 years. Patients received intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or bridging therapy. Baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke subtype classifications, neuroimaging findings, and treatment time metrics were collected. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale at discharge and at three months. Complications, including hemorrhagic events and mortality, were documented. Results Patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy demonstrated greater neurological improvement and higher rates of favorable functional outcomes compared with those treated with thrombolysis alone. Bridging therapy achieved the highest proportion of good outcomes, followed by mechanical thrombectomy. Overall mortality was lower among patients who achieved successful reperfusion. Shorter door-to-needle and door-to-puncture times were significantly associated with improved functional outcomes. Conclusions In this real-world Egyptian cohort, mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy were associated with superior functional outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone. Bridging therapy yielded the most favorable outcomes without an increase in complications, supporting expanded access to endovascular stroke therapies in developing countries. Conflict of interest mohamad monzer: nothing to disclose

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Stroke Journal
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.1470
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1005 OUTCOME OF REPERFUSION THERAPIES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE OF AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS

Wael Osman, Mohamad Monzer, Elsayed Abed
European Stroke Journal
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

ABSTRACT NUMBER: ESOC2026A1005 OUTCOME OF REPERFUSION THERAPIES IN ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS; EXPERIENCE OF AL-AZHAR UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS

Wael Osman, Mohamad Monzer, Elsayed Abed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Reperfusion therapies, including intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and combined bridging therapy, have significantly improved outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. However, comparative real-world data from developing countries remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes associated with different reperfusion strategies in an Egyptian tertiary stroke center. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study of 237 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated at Al-Azhar University Hospitals. The cohort included approximately 140 males and 97 females, aged 32 to 85 years. Patients received intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or bridging therapy. Baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, stroke subtype classifications, neuroimaging findings, and treatment time metrics were collected. Stroke severity was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale at discharge and at three months. Complications, including hemorrhagic events and mortality, were documented. Results Patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy demonstrated greater neurological improvement and higher rates of favorable functional outcomes compared with those treated with thrombolysis alone. Bridging therapy achieved the highest proportion of good outcomes, followed by mechanical thrombectomy. Overall mortality was lower among patients who achieved successful reperfusion. Shorter door-to-needle and door-to-puncture times were significantly associated with improved functional outcomes. Conclusions In this real-world Egyptian cohort, mechanical thrombectomy and bridging therapy were associated with superior functional outcomes compared with intravenous thrombolysis alone. Bridging therapy yielded the most favorable outcomes without an increase in complications, supporting expanded access to endovascular stroke therapies in developing countries. Conflict of interest mohamad monzer: nothing to disclose

European Stroke JournalVol. 11(Supplement_1)
Al-Azhar University (EG), Al-Azhar University (ID), Al Azhar University (QA)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.