Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme impacts women’s mental health via food security in rural Bangladesh

INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity and malnutrition, as well as poor mental health, negatively impact millions of people worldwide and can reinforce each other, compounded by gender inequity. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions have the potential to improve these simultaneously. We analysed the impact of a homestead food production (HFP) programme on women's mental health, including pathways through food insecurity, women's empowerment and dietary diversity. METHODS: The Food and Agricultural Approaches to Malnutrition cluster-randomised trial allocated 96 settlements in northeastern Bangladesh 1:1 to a HFP programme, implemented 2015-2018, and control. Data were collected at baseline in 2015, at endline in 2019/20 and continuously through a surveillance system. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS). We quantified the intervention's impact on depressive symptoms at endline, analysing data from 2513 women using multilevel regression. We also examined whether that effect was mediated by household food security, women's empowerment and women's dietary diversity, using sequential mediation analysis with cluster-bootstrapped standard errors, adjusting for baseline covariates. RESULTS: At baseline, 39% of households were severely food insecure and 69% of women did not have minimally diverse diets. At endline, 38% of women in the control and 32% in the intervention arm screened positive for depressive symptoms (EPDS≥12). The intervention reduced the odds of depressive symptoms by 23% (OR 0.77, p=0.03). There was no evidence that the combined pathway reduced depression (OR 0.95, p=0.24). When decomposed, food security was responsible for one-third of the total effect (OR 0.92, p=0.01). Most of the intervention effect on depression was through other pathways (OR 0.81, p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: On average, intervention participants had better mental health 1 year after the programme ended, with some of the effect mediated by increased food security. There are likely other pathways through which nutrition-sensitive agriculture can improve mental health, such as social protection and income, which may act synergistically. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02505711.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Global Health
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-020509
Primary Topic
Child Nutrition and Water Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme impacts women’s mental health via food security in rural Bangladesh

Sabine Gabrysch, Axel Mayer, Claudia Offner, Cesar Cornejo et al.
BMJ Global Health
Child Nutrition and Water Access
article

Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme impacts women’s mental health via food security in rural Bangladesh

Sabine Gabrysch, Axel Mayer, Claudia Offner, Cesar Cornejo, Suneetha Kadiyala, Jillian L Waid, Thalia M Sparling
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Food insecurity and malnutrition, as well as poor mental health, negatively impact millions of people worldwide and can reinforce each other, compounded by gender inequity. Nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions have the potential to improve these simultaneously. We analysed the impact of a homestead food production (HFP) programme on women's mental health, including pathways through food insecurity, women's empowerment and dietary diversity. METHODS: The Food and Agricultural Approaches to Malnutrition cluster-randomised trial allocated 96 settlements in northeastern Bangladesh 1:1 to a HFP programme, implemented 2015-2018, and control. Data were collected at baseline in 2015, at endline in 2019/20 and continuously through a surveillance system. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS). We quantified the intervention's impact on depressive symptoms at endline, analysing data from 2513 women using multilevel regression. We also examined whether that effect was mediated by household food security, women's empowerment and women's dietary diversity, using sequential mediation analysis with cluster-bootstrapped standard errors, adjusting for baseline covariates. RESULTS: At baseline, 39% of households were severely food insecure and 69% of women did not have minimally diverse diets. At endline, 38% of women in the control and 32% in the intervention arm screened positive for depressive symptoms (EPDS≥12). The intervention reduced the odds of depressive symptoms by 23% (OR 0.77, p=0.03). There was no evidence that the combined pathway reduced depression (OR 0.95, p=0.24). When decomposed, food security was responsible for one-third of the total effect (OR 0.92, p=0.01). Most of the intervention effect on depression was through other pathways (OR 0.81, p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: On average, intervention participants had better mental health 1 year after the programme ended, with some of the effect mediated by increased food security. There are likely other pathways through which nutrition-sensitive agriculture can improve mental health, such as social protection and income, which may act synergistically. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02505711.

BMJ Global HealthVol. 11(5)
Helen Keller International (US), Bielefeld University (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Cambridge (GB), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, PATH, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Government of the United Kingdom, Innovative Methods and Metrics for Agriculture and Nutrition Actions, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Department for International Development, Stiftung Charité
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Child Nutrition and Water Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.