The Anatomy of the Online Book Review

With the availability of massive amounts of data, online reviews have become a promising source for detecting readers’ engagement with fiction. Yet identifying expressions of response to reading (such as emotions, evaluations, and feelings) remains challenging for automated analysis, given the unstructured nature of reviews. This study proposes a method for categorizing review content in order to distinguish between sentences referring to readers’ experiences and those addressing other book-related aspects, such as plot, characters, or author. We first designed an annotation schema, after assessing previous classifications. Then, we manually annotated according to our schema the sentences from 1,400 Dutch fiction reviews. Subsequently, we trained a robBERT2023 classifier to automate review sentence classification and applied it to a corpus of 670,751 reviews. Our analysis allows us to draw conclusions on the composition of online reviews and correlations among their components.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26083/tuda-7995
Primary Topic
Media Influence and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Anatomy of the Online Book Review

P. Boot, Marijn Koolen, Joris van Zundert, Katja Tereshko et al.
Open MIND
Media Influence and Health
article

The Anatomy of the Online Book Review

P. Boot, Marijn Koolen, Joris van Zundert, Katja Tereshko, Silvia Lilli
article en

Abstract

With the availability of massive amounts of data, online reviews have become a promising source for detecting readers’ engagement with fiction. Yet identifying expressions of response to reading (such as emotions, evaluations, and feelings) remains challenging for automated analysis, given the unstructured nature of reviews. This study proposes a method for categorizing review content in order to distinguish between sentences referring to readers’ experiences and those addressing other book-related aspects, such as plot, characters, or author. We first designed an annotation schema, after assessing previous classifications. Then, we manually annotated according to our schema the sentences from 1,400 Dutch fiction reviews. Subsequently, we trained a robBERT2023 classifier to automate review sentence classification and applied it to a corpus of 670,751 reviews. Our analysis allows us to draw conclusions on the composition of online reviews and correlations among their components.

Open MIND
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Media Influence and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.