An axiological turn in Russian elitogenesis: 
from pluralism to state-civilizational 
consolidation

The purpose of this work is to substantiate the need for an axiological turn in the theory of political elites and to demonstrate a value-civilizational approach using the example of the evolution of the Russian elite. The research methodology is based on the integration of comparative historical analysis used to identify the continuity of value codes, discourse analysis of official documents and public speeches to identify axiological elite attitudes, and an institutional approach to study the mechanisms of recruiting and rotation. Within the framework of the article, elite genesis is interpreted as an institutionally mediated political process involved in the dynamics of power interactions and management technologies. It is shown that the value attitudes of the ruling groups perform the function of a normative regulator of the institutional behavior of the elites, determining the nature of the use of political technologies, models of managerial decision-making and forms of interaction with social and corporate actors. In this context, the elite acts as a subject of institutional design and transformation of political processes, and not solely as a carrier of formal power status. The authors conclude that modern Russian elitogenesis is moving from a pluralistic model to a model of guided axiological consolidation around the «state-civilization» project. The key features of this transformation are: the primacy of ideological loyalty over meritocracy, the strengthening of the role of the power elite, the centralization of personnel processes and the use of the discourse of traditional values as a tool for effective management in the face of global challenges. The identified trends and contradictions between ideological isolation and the need for innovation are of practical importance for predicting the trajectories of political development and personnel policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Political Research
Published
2026-03-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2026-10-1-39-56
Primary Topic
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An axiological turn in Russian elitogenesis: 
from pluralism to state-civilizational 
consolidation

Lyudmila Ivanova, Oleg Artyuhin
Journal of Political Research
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
article

An axiological turn in Russian elitogenesis: 
from pluralism to state-civilizational 
consolidation

Lyudmila Ivanova, Oleg Artyuhin
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to substantiate the need for an axiological turn in the theory of political elites and to demonstrate a value-civilizational approach using the example of the evolution of the Russian elite. The research methodology is based on the integration of comparative historical analysis used to identify the continuity of value codes, discourse analysis of official documents and public speeches to identify axiological elite attitudes, and an institutional approach to study the mechanisms of recruiting and rotation. Within the framework of the article, elite genesis is interpreted as an institutionally mediated political process involved in the dynamics of power interactions and management technologies. It is shown that the value attitudes of the ruling groups perform the function of a normative regulator of the institutional behavior of the elites, determining the nature of the use of political technologies, models of managerial decision-making and forms of interaction with social and corporate actors. In this context, the elite acts as a subject of institutional design and transformation of political processes, and not solely as a carrier of formal power status. The authors conclude that modern Russian elitogenesis is moving from a pluralistic model to a model of guided axiological consolidation around the «state-civilization» project. The key features of this transformation are: the primacy of ideological loyalty over meritocracy, the strengthening of the role of the power elite, the centralization of personnel processes and the use of the discourse of traditional values as a tool for effective management in the face of global challenges. The identified trends and contradictions between ideological isolation and the need for innovation are of practical importance for predicting the trajectories of political development and personnel policy.

Journal of Political ResearchVol. 10(1)
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RU), Institute of Service and Entrepreneurship of DGTU (RU), Don State Technical University (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.