Physics-informed neural networks for form-finding of unilateral membrane structures

The form-finding of unilateral membrane structures is often addressed by solving equilibrium equations using Finite Element Methods (FEMs). In this paper, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are investigated as an alternative, in which the equilibrium equation is enforced by minimizing its residual at collocation points through neural-network training, rather than by solving a mesh-based discretized system. This alternative is particularly suitable for form-finding problems based on Membrane Equilibrium Analysis (MEA), where the unknown is a membrane governed by a second-order elliptic Partial Differential Equation (PDE) with Dirichlet boundary conditions. This paper proposes PINNs for the form-finding of unilateral membrane structures governed by prescribed Airy-stress fields and compares two formulations: a soft-Boundary Condition (soft-BC) approach, in which the boundary conditions are enforced through a penalty term, and a hard-BC approach, in which they are satisfied by construction through distance and lift functions. The two approaches are assessed on three case studies of different geometrical complexity, involving both compression-only and tension-only stress states, as well as combined self-weight, concentrated vertical loads, and horizontal actions. The results show that both formulations provide membrane surfaces in close agreement with solutions obtained with a PDE solver based on the FEM. The hard-BC formulation yields smaller errors and a smoother spatial distribution of the residual, especially near the boundary, indicating that the exact treatment of the Dirichlet conditions has a direct influence on the overall solution accuracy. The soft-BC formulation, however, still provides structurally meaningful solutions and remains attractive when a simpler implementation is preferred and a limited relaxation of the boundary data is acceptable. Overall, the study demonstrates that PINNs are a viable numerical alternative for MEA-based form-finding and that the choice between soft and hard boundary enforcement depends on the prescribed boundary condition in the structural problem.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2026.105453
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Physics-informed neural networks for form-finding of unilateral membrane structures

Sigrid Adriaenssens, Carlo Olivieri, Luigi Sibille
2 links
Advanced Engineering Informatics
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
article

Physics-informed neural networks for form-finding of unilateral membrane structures

Sigrid Adriaenssens, Carlo Olivieri, Luigi Sibille
article en

Abstract

The form-finding of unilateral membrane structures is often addressed by solving equilibrium equations using Finite Element Methods (FEMs). In this paper, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are investigated as an alternative, in which the equilibrium equation is enforced by minimizing its residual at collocation points through neural-network training, rather than by solving a mesh-based discretized system. This alternative is particularly suitable for form-finding problems based on Membrane Equilibrium Analysis (MEA), where the unknown is a membrane governed by a second-order elliptic Partial Differential Equation (PDE) with Dirichlet boundary conditions. This paper proposes PINNs for the form-finding of unilateral membrane structures governed by prescribed Airy-stress fields and compares two formulations: a soft-Boundary Condition (soft-BC) approach, in which the boundary conditions are enforced through a penalty term, and a hard-BC approach, in which they are satisfied by construction through distance and lift functions. The two approaches are assessed on three case studies of different geometrical complexity, involving both compression-only and tension-only stress states, as well as combined self-weight, concentrated vertical loads, and horizontal actions. The results show that both formulations provide membrane surfaces in close agreement with solutions obtained with a PDE solver based on the FEM. The hard-BC formulation yields smaller errors and a smoother spatial distribution of the residual, especially near the boundary, indicating that the exact treatment of the Dirichlet conditions has a direct influence on the overall solution accuracy. The soft-BC formulation, however, still provides structurally meaningful solutions and remains attractive when a simpler implementation is preferred and a limited relaxation of the boundary data is acceptable. Overall, the study demonstrates that PINNs are a viable numerical alternative for MEA-based form-finding and that the choice between soft and hard boundary enforcement depends on the prescribed boundary condition in the structural problem.

Advanced Engineering InformaticsVol. 77
Princeton University (US), Pegaso University (IT)
National Science Foundation
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon