Codesigning Communication Interventions With Adolescents, Parents, and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES: Adolescents and young adults are rarely included alongside parents and clinicians in codesign of interventions in pediatric oncology, particularly for sensitive communication topics such as prognosis. We examined the feasibility of mixed-participant codesign, including pediatric patients, parents, bereaved parents, and multidisciplinary clinicians, within the RIGHTime study. METHODS: We conducted eight longitudinal virtual mixed-participant codesign sessions across four sequential blocks spanning 5 months. Eligible participants included patients aged ≥12 years with advanced cancer, parents of children with advanced cancer, bereaved parents, oncologists, and psychosocial clinicians. Feasibility outcomes included enrollment and attendance. To characterize participants' experiences, we analyzed structured reflections from each session, eliciting perspectives on the benefits and challenges of the mixed-participant codesign approach. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants contributed: patients (n = 4), parents (n = 5), bereaved parents (n = 4), oncologists (n = 5), and psychosocial clinicians (n = 3). Among invited patients and parents, 13/19 enrolled, and the mean attendance across four blocks was 92.5%. Reflections highlighted the value of shared dialogue, including learning across perspectives, connection, and attention to individualized communication. Patients and parents described gratitude and legacy-oriented motivations; clinicians described perspective-taking and incorporation of insights into communication practices. Across groups, reflections suggested that shared dialogue informed both intervention development and clinician communication practices. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed-participant codesign that includes adolescents and young adults alongside parents and clinicians was feasible in pediatric oncology communication research. Participant reflections suggest this approach may support the development of patient-centered communication interventions and inform clinician communication practices. This model may be transferable to pediatric oncology settings where patient perspectives are essential to intervention design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT05116566.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/1545-5017.70382
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Codesigning Communication Interventions With Adolescents, Parents, and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: A Feasibility Study

Harmony Farner, R. Elyse Heidelberg, Pamela Hinds, Jennifer W. Mack et al.
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

Codesigning Communication Interventions With Adolescents, Parents, and Clinicians in Pediatric Oncology: A Feasibility Study

Harmony Farner, R. Elyse Heidelberg, Pamela Hinds, Jennifer W. Mack, the RIGHTime Communication Collaborative, Heather Brandt, Caroline Christianson, Erica C. Kaye
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adolescents and young adults are rarely included alongside parents and clinicians in codesign of interventions in pediatric oncology, particularly for sensitive communication topics such as prognosis. We examined the feasibility of mixed-participant codesign, including pediatric patients, parents, bereaved parents, and multidisciplinary clinicians, within the RIGHTime study. METHODS: We conducted eight longitudinal virtual mixed-participant codesign sessions across four sequential blocks spanning 5 months. Eligible participants included patients aged ≥12 years with advanced cancer, parents of children with advanced cancer, bereaved parents, oncologists, and psychosocial clinicians. Feasibility outcomes included enrollment and attendance. To characterize participants' experiences, we analyzed structured reflections from each session, eliciting perspectives on the benefits and challenges of the mixed-participant codesign approach. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants contributed: patients (n = 4), parents (n = 5), bereaved parents (n = 4), oncologists (n = 5), and psychosocial clinicians (n = 3). Among invited patients and parents, 13/19 enrolled, and the mean attendance across four blocks was 92.5%. Reflections highlighted the value of shared dialogue, including learning across perspectives, connection, and attention to individualized communication. Patients and parents described gratitude and legacy-oriented motivations; clinicians described perspective-taking and incorporation of insights into communication practices. Across groups, reflections suggested that shared dialogue informed both intervention development and clinician communication practices. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed-participant codesign that includes adolescents and young adults alongside parents and clinicians was feasible in pediatric oncology communication research. Participant reflections suggest this approach may support the development of patient-centered communication interventions and inform clinician communication practices. This model may be transferable to pediatric oncology settings where patient perspectives are essential to intervention design. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT05116566.

Pediatric Blood & Cancer
Boston Children's Hospital (US), St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US), Children's National (US), George Washington University (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, National Cancer Institute
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.