Three-dimensional CT volumetry and pulmonary function outcomes after segmentectomy versus lobectomy

OBJECTIVES: Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection, including segmentectomy, provides non-inferior overall survival compared with lobectomy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, these trials have shown unexpectedly small differences in postoperative pulmonary function. Compensatory expansion of the residual lung may explain these limited differences. Therefore, we used three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry to quantify compensatory expansion of the residual lung and clarify its role in functional preservation after segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. METHODS: This prospective observational study analyzed 51 patients who underwent segmentectomy and 64 patients who underwent lobectomy. 3D-CT volumetry was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively to quantify non-emphysematous lung volume (NELV; morphologically preserved parenchyma) and low-attenuation volume (LAV; emphysematous regions). Changes in lung volume and pulmonary function were expressed as percentages of preoperative values. Volumetric and functional outcomes were compared overall and by resected lobe. RESULTS: than lobectomy (98.7% vs. 91.5%, P=.015), despite similar volumetric preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures achieve similar outcomes through compensatory expansion, which explains the unexpectedly small functional differences observed in recent randomized trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2026.04.034
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Three-dimensional CT volumetry and pulmonary function outcomes after segmentectomy versus lobectomy

Tatsuya Goto, Masanori Tsuchida, Yuki Shimizu, Terumoto Koike et al.
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Three-dimensional CT volumetry and pulmonary function outcomes after segmentectomy versus lobectomy

Tatsuya Goto, Masanori Tsuchida, Yuki Shimizu, Terumoto Koike, Takahiro Tanaka, Mototsugu Tanaka, Masaya Nakamura, Haruna Miyazawa, Atsushi Hashimoto
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that sublobar resection, including segmentectomy, provides non-inferior overall survival compared with lobectomy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, these trials have shown unexpectedly small differences in postoperative pulmonary function. Compensatory expansion of the residual lung may explain these limited differences. Therefore, we used three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) volumetry to quantify compensatory expansion of the residual lung and clarify its role in functional preservation after segmentectomy compared with lobectomy. METHODS: This prospective observational study analyzed 51 patients who underwent segmentectomy and 64 patients who underwent lobectomy. 3D-CT volumetry was performed preoperatively and at 12 months postoperatively to quantify non-emphysematous lung volume (NELV; morphologically preserved parenchyma) and low-attenuation volume (LAV; emphysematous regions). Changes in lung volume and pulmonary function were expressed as percentages of preoperative values. Volumetric and functional outcomes were compared overall and by resected lobe. RESULTS: than lobectomy (98.7% vs. 91.5%, P=.015), despite similar volumetric preservation. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures achieve similar outcomes through compensatory expansion, which explains the unexpectedly small functional differences observed in recent randomized trials.

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital (JP), Niigata University (JP)
Niigata University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.