The Shifting Sands of Digital Transformation: Toward an International Political Sociology of Tinkering and Contestation

International Political Sociology (IPS) needs to engage digital transformation, loosely defined as how digital technologies become part of and re-shape social and political practices, structures, and relationships. We argue that digital transformation is seldom fixed or complete. Rather, it is subject to ongoing mutations and adjustments, based on technological advancements and idiosyncrasies as much as on political programs, struggles, and evolving legal frameworks. We thus propose to understand digital transformation in terms of shifting sands—that is, a dynamic, unstable, and largely unpredictable environment where frequent change makes stability elusive. To grapple with such mutability, we elaborate on the concepts of tinkering and contestation. We do so by drawing on Science and Technology Studies and Jacques Rancière’s work on the (re-)distribution of the sensible. Using empirical illustrations from our previous research on the processing of air travelers’ data for security purposes, we showcase how a focus on tinkering and contestation enriches IPS’s analytical vocabulary and its approach to digital transformation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-433990
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Shifting Sands of Digital Transformation: Toward an International Political Sociology of Tinkering and Contestation

Georgios Glouftsios, Matthias Leese, Rocco Bellanova
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Shifting Sands of Digital Transformation: Toward an International Political Sociology of Tinkering and Contestation

Georgios Glouftsios, Matthias Leese, Rocco Bellanova
article en

Abstract

International Political Sociology (IPS) needs to engage digital transformation, loosely defined as how digital technologies become part of and re-shape social and political practices, structures, and relationships. We argue that digital transformation is seldom fixed or complete. Rather, it is subject to ongoing mutations and adjustments, based on technological advancements and idiosyncrasies as much as on political programs, struggles, and evolving legal frameworks. We thus propose to understand digital transformation in terms of shifting sands—that is, a dynamic, unstable, and largely unpredictable environment where frequent change makes stability elusive. To grapple with such mutability, we elaborate on the concepts of tinkering and contestation. We do so by drawing on Science and Technology Studies and Jacques Rancière’s work on the (re-)distribution of the sensible. Using empirical illustrations from our previous research on the processing of air travelers’ data for security purposes, we showcase how a focus on tinkering and contestation enriches IPS’s analytical vocabulary and its approach to digital transformation.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.