Assessing the Heterogeneity in Mode Effects on Data Quality, Response Distributions, and Future Participation Across Sociodemographic Subgroups in a Mixed-Mode Panel Study

Introducing a web option in interviewer-administered surveys could increase response rates and reduce costs. However, this requires careful assessment of the effects of mixed-mode designs on data quality and key measures, especially across important sociodemographic subgroups. In 2018 and 2020, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) experimentally introduced web in a sequential mixed-mode design for panelists assigned to the telephone mode. Initial analyses found a limited number of mode effects on key outcome distributions and data quality measures. This paper extends this initial analysis by assessing possible heterogeneity in these effects among sociodemographic subgroups defined by race/ethnicity, sex, and others. We interact mode with each sociodemographic indicator in statistical models for each outcome. Overall, we found limited evidence of heterogeneity in the mode effects, with 3% of the 204 interaction terms we tested emerging as significant. For example, previous work showed that more household roster changes are reported in the web-first group, and we found that this was more pronounced for females and those with some college education. Although some heterogeneity in mode effects was observed across subgroups, the effects were generally too small to cause data quality concerns. We conclude with a discussion of broader considerations for survey researchers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Official Statistics
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0282423x261429705
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Heterogeneity in Mode Effects on Data Quality, Response Distributions, and Future Participation Across Sociodemographic Subgroups in a Mixed-Mode Panel Study

Heather Schroeder, Mary Beth Ofstedal, Brady T. West
Journal of Official Statistics
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Assessing the Heterogeneity in Mode Effects on Data Quality, Response Distributions, and Future Participation Across Sociodemographic Subgroups in a Mixed-Mode Panel Study

Heather Schroeder, Mary Beth Ofstedal, Brady T. West
article en

Abstract

Introducing a web option in interviewer-administered surveys could increase response rates and reduce costs. However, this requires careful assessment of the effects of mixed-mode designs on data quality and key measures, especially across important sociodemographic subgroups. In 2018 and 2020, the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) experimentally introduced web in a sequential mixed-mode design for panelists assigned to the telephone mode. Initial analyses found a limited number of mode effects on key outcome distributions and data quality measures. This paper extends this initial analysis by assessing possible heterogeneity in these effects among sociodemographic subgroups defined by race/ethnicity, sex, and others. We interact mode with each sociodemographic indicator in statistical models for each outcome. Overall, we found limited evidence of heterogeneity in the mode effects, with 3% of the 204 interaction terms we tested emerging as significant. For example, previous work showed that more household roster changes are reported in the web-first group, and we found that this was more pronounced for females and those with some college education. Although some heterogeneity in mode effects was observed across subgroups, the effects were generally too small to cause data quality concerns. We conclude with a discussion of broader considerations for survey researchers.

Journal of Official Statistics
University of Michigan (US)
U.S. Social Security Administration, National Institute on Aging
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.