Yield and fidelity of early steps of ribosome-free translation depend on the RNA anchoring

Before the translational machinery came into being, a simpler form of reading RNA sequences to instruct peptide synthesis must have existed. What this earliest form of translation was is unclear. Ribosome-free synthesis, relying solely on Watson-Crick base pairing and chemical reactivity, is a likely candidate. The established version of this process involves chain growth at the C-terminus of N-terminally anchored peptides. Here, we show that ribosome- and enzyme-free translation via chain growth at the N-terminus of C-terminally anchored peptides is also feasible. Yields for the formation of dipeptides via the latter process were between 6% and 46%, though, as compared to 60%-99% for dipeptides with opposite strand growth orientation. Translation fidelity to dipeptides was also lower, with just 55%-84% correct incorporation, versus 64%-92% for N-terminally linked dipeptides. On the tripeptide level, the preference for C-terminal chain growth was smaller, suggesting that only the very first step has a strong bias for N-terminal anchoring. Finally, mixed anhydride pre-activation was found to be an alternative to in situ activation for peptidyl RNAs. This data sheds light on putative early steps in the evolution of translation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2026-04-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkag404
Primary Topic
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Yield and fidelity of early steps of ribosome-free translation depend on the RNA anchoring

Clemens Richert, Patrick Haas, Nikolaos Giannakopoulos
Nucleic Acids Research
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
article

Yield and fidelity of early steps of ribosome-free translation depend on the RNA anchoring

Clemens Richert, Patrick Haas, Nikolaos Giannakopoulos
article en

Abstract

Before the translational machinery came into being, a simpler form of reading RNA sequences to instruct peptide synthesis must have existed. What this earliest form of translation was is unclear. Ribosome-free synthesis, relying solely on Watson-Crick base pairing and chemical reactivity, is a likely candidate. The established version of this process involves chain growth at the C-terminus of N-terminally anchored peptides. Here, we show that ribosome- and enzyme-free translation via chain growth at the N-terminus of C-terminally anchored peptides is also feasible. Yields for the formation of dipeptides via the latter process were between 6% and 46%, though, as compared to 60%-99% for dipeptides with opposite strand growth orientation. Translation fidelity to dipeptides was also lower, with just 55%-84% correct incorporation, versus 64%-92% for N-terminally linked dipeptides. On the tripeptide level, the preference for C-terminal chain growth was smaller, suggesting that only the very first step has a strong bias for N-terminal anchoring. Finally, mixed anhydride pre-activation was found to be an alternative to in situ activation for peptidyl RNAs. This data sheds light on putative early steps in the evolution of translation.

Nucleic Acids ResearchVol. 54(9)
University of Stuttgart (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Stuttgart
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.