Effect of Public Pensions on Inequality of Opportunity in China

ABSTRACT Employing data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) from 2013 to 2019 and utilizing regression‐based approaches, this study examines how the public pension system (PPS) marginally affects overall income inequality, inequality of opportunity (IOp), and poverty in China. Our results show that PPS alleviates overall income inequality and diminishes poverty, but is not effective in reducing IOp. Particularly, it worsens IOp among the elderly households. Age disparity is alleviated by the PPS, while the disparities between hukou and residential provinces are significantly raised. Furthermore, the quantile‐based analysis indicates that PPS has diverse marginal impacts on households across the income distribution. Our findings suggest that policy efforts should focus on these persistent challenges, with reforms on pension and other institutional issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70069
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Public Pensions on Inequality of Opportunity in China

Dongyuan Mu, Junjie Li
Review of Income and Wealth
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Effect of Public Pensions on Inequality of Opportunity in China

Dongyuan Mu, Junjie Li
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Employing data from the China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) from 2013 to 2019 and utilizing regression‐based approaches, this study examines how the public pension system (PPS) marginally affects overall income inequality, inequality of opportunity (IOp), and poverty in China. Our results show that PPS alleviates overall income inequality and diminishes poverty, but is not effective in reducing IOp. Particularly, it worsens IOp among the elderly households. Age disparity is alleviated by the PPS, while the disparities between hukou and residential provinces are significantly raised. Furthermore, the quantile‐based analysis indicates that PPS has diverse marginal impacts on households across the income distribution. Our findings suggest that policy efforts should focus on these persistent challenges, with reforms on pension and other institutional issues.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 72(2)
Hitotsubashi University (JP), Japan Real Estate Institute (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effect of Public Pensions on Inequality of Opportunity in China — Dongyuan Mu, Junjie Li · Review of Income and Wealth (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS