Protest Emergence Socioeconomic Characteristics and the 1960s Sit-ins Predict the Black Lives Matter’s Formative Protest Period (2014–2017)

While many explanations in the literature propose socioeconomic and structural explanations for the rise of protest activity, historical dimensions are often overlooked. Less work undertakes quantitative analysis of these explanations in relation to what has been described by some as the biggest U.S. movement in history, Black Lives Matter (BLM). First, we determine whether socioeconomic and organizational factors, which researchers have used to study the sit-ins during the Civil Rights Movement, are useful for predicting BLM protests. Second, we examine whether counties that had sit-ins in 1960 were more likely to participate in BLM protests. We analyze 1386 BLM demonstrations between July 2014 and January 2017 alongside data from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings show that several factors that predicted sit-ins predict BLM protests. We also find evidence of an enduring legacy of sit-ins on BLM protests above and beyond socioeconomic predictors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sociological Perspectives
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07311214261438756
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Protest Emergence Socioeconomic Characteristics and the 1960s Sit-ins Predict the Black Lives Matter’s Formative Protest Period (2014–2017)

Urooj S. Raja, Phil M. Pendergast
Sociological Perspectives
Political Conflict and Governance
article

Protest Emergence Socioeconomic Characteristics and the 1960s Sit-ins Predict the Black Lives Matter’s Formative Protest Period (2014–2017)

Urooj S. Raja, Phil M. Pendergast
article en

Abstract

While many explanations in the literature propose socioeconomic and structural explanations for the rise of protest activity, historical dimensions are often overlooked. Less work undertakes quantitative analysis of these explanations in relation to what has been described by some as the biggest U.S. movement in history, Black Lives Matter (BLM). First, we determine whether socioeconomic and organizational factors, which researchers have used to study the sit-ins during the Civil Rights Movement, are useful for predicting BLM protests. Second, we examine whether counties that had sit-ins in 1960 were more likely to participate in BLM protests. We analyze 1386 BLM demonstrations between July 2014 and January 2017 alongside data from the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our findings show that several factors that predicted sit-ins predict BLM protests. We also find evidence of an enduring legacy of sit-ins on BLM protests above and beyond socioeconomic predictors.

Sociological Perspectives
Loyola University Chicago (US), Western Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Political Conflict and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Protest Emergence Socioeconomic Characteristics and the 1960s Sit-ins Predict the Black Lives Matter’s Formative Protest Period (2014–2017) — Urooj S. Raja, Phil M. Pendergast · Sociological Perspectives (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS