The motivational impact of the standards for student supervision and assessment in midwifery

The strength of midwifery students’ motivation to learn in the practice environment is directly influenced by the standards for student supervision and assessment, but how they impact learning has not been explored. This article described the application of an interpretative macro theory of motivated learning in the evaluation of these standards. The findings of two independent studies that explored implementation of the standards for student supervision and assessment were interpretatively mapped to a macro, motivational and volitional process theory. Four motivational root problems emerged: an ambiguous goal system, low student interest and curiosity, decreased student and staff expectancies for success and negative emotionality associated with students’ non-self-regulation. The standards fail to distinguish between mastery and performance goals, influencing students’ motivation to learn.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Midwifery
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2025.0111
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The motivational impact of the standards for student supervision and assessment in midwifery

Mary Gillespie, Debbie Cordner, Fiona Bradley, Clare Hughes et al.
British Journal of Midwifery
Innovations in Medical Education
article

The motivational impact of the standards for student supervision and assessment in midwifery

Mary Gillespie, Debbie Cordner, Fiona Bradley, Clare Hughes, Rebecca Barr, Lorna Lawther, Janine Stockdale
article en

Abstract

The strength of midwifery students’ motivation to learn in the practice environment is directly influenced by the standards for student supervision and assessment, but how they impact learning has not been explored. This article described the application of an interpretative macro theory of motivated learning in the evaluation of these standards. The findings of two independent studies that explored implementation of the standards for student supervision and assessment were interpretatively mapped to a macro, motivational and volitional process theory. Four motivational root problems emerged: an ambiguous goal system, low student interest and curiosity, decreased student and staff expectancies for success and negative emotionality associated with students’ non-self-regulation. The standards fail to distinguish between mastery and performance goals, influencing students’ motivation to learn.

British Journal of MidwiferyVol. 34(5)
Northern Ireland Council for Voluntary Action (GB), Onderwijsraad (NL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.