Assessing Climate Benefits and Circularity of Using Glass Waste in Concrete and New Glass Production

Flat glass waste from building demolition is an underused resource with potential to reduce the climate impact of construction materials. This study compares two recycling pathways for flat glass waste: the first is closed-loop recycling into new glass, and the second is the use of glass in concrete as a replacement for cement. The comparison is based on life cycle, circularity assessment and experimental evaluation of concrete performance. Recycling flat glass into new glass can reduce emissions by 945 kg CO2eq per ton of recycled glass when the production mix contains 65 percent recycled content. However, only between 1 and 3% percent of demolition flat glass is suitable for this process because of contamination and quality limitations. As a result, the practical climate benefit of demolition glass in new glass production is limited to about 38 kg CO2eq per ton of demolition glass. Concrete offers a much larger waste sink. Replacing 20% of cement with milled glass powder results in emission savings of 776 kg CO2eq per ton of glass. A concrete mix containing 33% glass shows the same compressive strength as a reference mix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091750
Primary Topic
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Climate Benefits and Circularity of Using Glass Waste in Concrete and New Glass Production

Nitin Harale, Madumita Sadagopan, Abdinasir Kadawo, Ágnes Nagy et al.
Materials
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
article

Assessing Climate Benefits and Circularity of Using Glass Waste in Concrete and New Glass Production

Nitin Harale, Madumita Sadagopan, Abdinasir Kadawo, Ágnes Nagy, Nada Al-Hellali, Habib Loubani
article en

Abstract

Flat glass waste from building demolition is an underused resource with potential to reduce the climate impact of construction materials. This study compares two recycling pathways for flat glass waste: the first is closed-loop recycling into new glass, and the second is the use of glass in concrete as a replacement for cement. The comparison is based on life cycle, circularity assessment and experimental evaluation of concrete performance. Recycling flat glass into new glass can reduce emissions by 945 kg CO2eq per ton of recycled glass when the production mix contains 65 percent recycled content. However, only between 1 and 3% percent of demolition flat glass is suitable for this process because of contamination and quality limitations. As a result, the practical climate benefit of demolition glass in new glass production is limited to about 38 kg CO2eq per ton of demolition glass. Concrete offers a much larger waste sink. Replacing 20% of cement with milled glass powder results in emission savings of 776 kg CO2eq per ton of glass. A concrete mix containing 33% glass shows the same compressive strength as a reference mix.

MaterialsVol. 19(9)
University of Borås (SE)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.