Complexities in perinatal mental health care: a salutogenic approach

This article explores the complexities of perinatal mental health care through the lens of Antonovsky's salutogenic model and his ‘six Cs’: complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Drawing on contemporary research, policy and reports, the authors critique the pathology-focused model that dominates current perinatal mental health services and advocates for a shift towards a health-promoting paradigm. The article examines systemic challenges, including poor interdisciplinary collaboration, inequitable service provision and education gaps for midwives, and highlights the potential of general and specific resistance resources to build a sense of coherence and improve care quality. It further argues for psychologically safe, civil work environments to counteract coercive cultures that impair safety and innovation. Ultimately, it calls for a balanced approach that supports staff manageability and meaningful engagement, improving outcomes for women experiencing perinatal mental health challenges

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Midwifery
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2025.0076
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexities in perinatal mental health care: a salutogenic approach

Elaine Erwin
1 citations
British Journal of Midwifery
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
25.00
article

Complexities in perinatal mental health care: a salutogenic approach

Elaine Erwin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the complexities of perinatal mental health care through the lens of Antonovsky's salutogenic model and his ‘six Cs’: complexity, conflict, chaos, coherence, coercion and civility. Drawing on contemporary research, policy and reports, the authors critique the pathology-focused model that dominates current perinatal mental health services and advocates for a shift towards a health-promoting paradigm. The article examines systemic challenges, including poor interdisciplinary collaboration, inequitable service provision and education gaps for midwives, and highlights the potential of general and specific resistance resources to build a sense of coherence and improve care quality. It further argues for psychologically safe, civil work environments to counteract coercive cultures that impair safety and innovation. Ultimately, it calls for a balanced approach that supports staff manageability and meaningful engagement, improving outcomes for women experiencing perinatal mental health challenges

British Journal of MidwiferyVol. 34(5)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
25.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complexities in perinatal mental health care: a salutogenic approach — Elaine Erwin · British Journal of Midwifery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS