Bleeding-Related Interactions Between DOACs and Cardiovascular Drugs: Insights from FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving direct-oral anticoagulants (DOACs) often have multiple cardiovascular disorders and are frequently exposed to polypharmacy. This study aimed to identify bleeding-related drug interactions between DOACs and cardiovascular drugs in the context of polypharmacy using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: Individual case safety reports involving apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban were extracted from FAERS. DOAC-related reports were classified according to exposure to concomitant use of predefined 15 drug classes of interest-ten cardiovascular drug classes, three classes of pharmacokinetic modifiers, anti-platelets, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-and bleeding events. Bleeding events were defined at three levels: haemorrhage-related events, actual bleeding events, and major bleeding. Major bleeding was further classified by anatomical site. Exact matching and logistic regression were performed to estimate adjusted reporting odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 317,583 eligible reports were included. Fifteen DOAC-drug combinations were consistently identified as significant interaction signals across the three bleeding definitions, with adjusted RORs ranging from 1.06 to 2.36. Diuretics showed consistent interaction signals across DOACs and bleeding definitions, while the strongest interaction signals were observed with digitalis glycosides, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and amiodarone analogs. Site-stratified major bleeding analyses identified 64 significant interaction signals, with rivaroxaban accounting for the largest proportion, whereas edoxaban showed a relatively less extensive interaction signal profile. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that consideration of polypharmacy and potential drug interactions may improve DOAC selection and risk stratification, particularly with concomitant cardiovascular drugs and site-specific bleeding risk, supporting closer monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2026.05.004
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bleeding-Related Interactions Between DOACs and Cardiovascular Drugs: Insights from FDA adverse event reporting system

Seunghyun Cheon, Jee-Eun Chung, Young Chul Kim, Yu-Seon Choi
The American Journal of Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Bleeding-Related Interactions Between DOACs and Cardiovascular Drugs: Insights from FDA adverse event reporting system

Seunghyun Cheon, Jee-Eun Chung, Young Chul Kim, Yu-Seon Choi
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving direct-oral anticoagulants (DOACs) often have multiple cardiovascular disorders and are frequently exposed to polypharmacy. This study aimed to identify bleeding-related drug interactions between DOACs and cardiovascular drugs in the context of polypharmacy using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: Individual case safety reports involving apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, or rivaroxaban were extracted from FAERS. DOAC-related reports were classified according to exposure to concomitant use of predefined 15 drug classes of interest-ten cardiovascular drug classes, three classes of pharmacokinetic modifiers, anti-platelets, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-and bleeding events. Bleeding events were defined at three levels: haemorrhage-related events, actual bleeding events, and major bleeding. Major bleeding was further classified by anatomical site. Exact matching and logistic regression were performed to estimate adjusted reporting odds ratios. RESULTS: A total of 317,583 eligible reports were included. Fifteen DOAC-drug combinations were consistently identified as significant interaction signals across the three bleeding definitions, with adjusted RORs ranging from 1.06 to 2.36. Diuretics showed consistent interaction signals across DOACs and bleeding definitions, while the strongest interaction signals were observed with digitalis glycosides, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and amiodarone analogs. Site-stratified major bleeding analyses identified 64 significant interaction signals, with rivaroxaban accounting for the largest proportion, whereas edoxaban showed a relatively less extensive interaction signal profile. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that consideration of polypharmacy and potential drug interactions may improve DOAC selection and risk stratification, particularly with concomitant cardiovascular drugs and site-specific bleeding risk, supporting closer monitoring.

The American Journal of Medicine
Hanyang University (KR)
National Research Foundation, Hanyang University, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.