The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2026 Expert Consensus Document: Guidelines for donor/recipient size-matching in lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Donor to recipient size matching is an essential part of lung transplantation, with significant mismatch leading to worse patient outcomes. The current practice is based on limited data along with broadly accepted themes that have not been articulated in the form of objective and definitive guidelines. The objective of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) expert panel was to develop evidence- and expert-based recommendations for optimal donor to recipient lung allograft size matching based on review of the existing literature. METHODS: The AATS CPSC assembled an expert panel of 18 lung transplant surgeons from 15 centers who developed a consensus document of recommendations. The panel was divided into subgroups covering size-matching in (1) bilateral lung transplantation, (2) single lung transplantation, (3) lobar transplantation, (4) unique situations, and (5) management of complications following severe size mismatch. Following a focused literature review, each subgroup formulated recommendation statements for each subtopic, which were reviewed and further refined using a Delphi process until consensus was achieved on each final statement by the voting group. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on 20 recommendations for current best practices in donor and recipient size matching. These recommendations include utilization of a ratio of donor-to-recipient predicted total lung capacity between 0.8 to 1.2, with special considerations based on recipient pathology, single lung or lobar transplantation, and anatomic variations such as chest wall abnormalities or significant mediastinal shift. Furthermore, oversized allografts can be reduced in size via non-anatomic or anatomic resection in select cases when required. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent practice guidelines regarding donor to recipient size matching will be helpful and important to achieve optimal outcomes in lung transplantation. The recommendations described here provide guidance for professionals involved in the care of patients with end-stage lung disease considered for transplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2026.03.620
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2026 Expert Consensus Document: Guidelines for donor/recipient size-matching in lung transplantation

Lara Schaheen, PHILIPPE LEMAITRE, STEPHANIE CHANG, Nuria Novoa et al.
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) 2026 Expert Consensus Document: Guidelines for donor/recipient size-matching in lung transplantation

Lara Schaheen, PHILIPPE LEMAITRE, STEPHANIE CHANG, Nuria Novoa, Bryan Whitson, John W. Stokes, Shaf Keshavjee, Pedro Catarino, Masaaki Sato, Usman Ahmad, Marcelo Cypel, Laurens Celeumans, Kieran Halloran, Konrad Hoetzenecker, John Haney, Varun Puri, Travis Geraci, Matthew G. Hartwig
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Donor to recipient size matching is an essential part of lung transplantation, with significant mismatch leading to worse patient outcomes. The current practice is based on limited data along with broadly accepted themes that have not been articulated in the form of objective and definitive guidelines. The objective of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) Clinical Practice Standards Committee (CPSC) expert panel was to develop evidence- and expert-based recommendations for optimal donor to recipient lung allograft size matching based on review of the existing literature. METHODS: The AATS CPSC assembled an expert panel of 18 lung transplant surgeons from 15 centers who developed a consensus document of recommendations. The panel was divided into subgroups covering size-matching in (1) bilateral lung transplantation, (2) single lung transplantation, (3) lobar transplantation, (4) unique situations, and (5) management of complications following severe size mismatch. Following a focused literature review, each subgroup formulated recommendation statements for each subtopic, which were reviewed and further refined using a Delphi process until consensus was achieved on each final statement by the voting group. RESULTS: The expert panel achieved consensus on 20 recommendations for current best practices in donor and recipient size matching. These recommendations include utilization of a ratio of donor-to-recipient predicted total lung capacity between 0.8 to 1.2, with special considerations based on recipient pathology, single lung or lobar transplantation, and anatomic variations such as chest wall abnormalities or significant mediastinal shift. Furthermore, oversized allografts can be reduced in size via non-anatomic or anatomic resection in select cases when required. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent practice guidelines regarding donor to recipient size matching will be helpful and important to achieve optimal outcomes in lung transplantation. The recommendations described here provide guidance for professionals involved in the care of patients with end-stage lung disease considered for transplantation.

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center (US), University of Alberta (CA), Duke University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), WinnMed (US), NYU Langone Health (US), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), The Ohio State University (US), The University of Tokyo (JP), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.