Sustainable fining strategies in Port wine: a One Health perspective on non-animal protein alternatives

Background: Fining is a key step in Port wine production, traditionally relying on animal-derived proteins to improve clarity and stability. However, concerns related to sustainability, allergenicity, and environmental impact have intensified the search for alternative approaches [1-3]. Within a One Health framework, the adoption of non-animal fining agents may contribute to more sustainable practices while addressing consumer health and environmental considerations. Objective: To evaluate the clarification efficiency and economic feasibility of non-animal protein-based fining agents applied to different Port wine styles. Methods: Eleven fining treatments were assessed, including ten alternative agents of plant, yeast, and fungal origin, with gelatine as a reference. Trials were conducted in White, Ruby, and Tawny Reserve Port wines, using three dosage levels within recommended ranges. Bentonite (45 g/hL) was applied to ensure protein stability. Clarification efficiency was evaluated through spectrophotometric measurement of colour intensity. Results: Liquid pea protein and yeast-derived protein demonstrated the highest reductions in colour intensity across the evaluated wines. However, these alternatives were associated with substantially higher costs compared to gelatine, with increases ranging from approximately four- to twenty-four-fold depending on wine style and dosage. Conclusions: Non-animal fining agents can achieve clarification performance comparable to conventional gelatine, supporting their potential as more sustainable and allergen-free alternatives. Nevertheless, despite higher costs, these alternatives may remain viable considering their technological performance and sustainability advantages. From a One Health perspective, these findings highlight the need to balance technological performance, economic feasibility, and sustainability in the transition towards more responsible wine production systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.473
Primary Topic
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable fining strategies in Port wine: a One Health perspective on non-animal protein alternatives

Luís Sottomayor, Víctor de Freitas, Diana Dias da Silva, David Miranda et al.
Science Letters
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
article

Sustainable fining strategies in Port wine: a One Health perspective on non-animal protein alternatives

Luís Sottomayor, Víctor de Freitas, Diana Dias da Silva, David Miranda, Mariana Carvalho, António Graça
article en

Abstract

Background: Fining is a key step in Port wine production, traditionally relying on animal-derived proteins to improve clarity and stability. However, concerns related to sustainability, allergenicity, and environmental impact have intensified the search for alternative approaches [1-3]. Within a One Health framework, the adoption of non-animal fining agents may contribute to more sustainable practices while addressing consumer health and environmental considerations. Objective: To evaluate the clarification efficiency and economic feasibility of non-animal protein-based fining agents applied to different Port wine styles. Methods: Eleven fining treatments were assessed, including ten alternative agents of plant, yeast, and fungal origin, with gelatine as a reference. Trials were conducted in White, Ruby, and Tawny Reserve Port wines, using three dosage levels within recommended ranges. Bentonite (45 g/hL) was applied to ensure protein stability. Clarification efficiency was evaluated through spectrophotometric measurement of colour intensity. Results: Liquid pea protein and yeast-derived protein demonstrated the highest reductions in colour intensity across the evaluated wines. However, these alternatives were associated with substantially higher costs compared to gelatine, with increases ranging from approximately four- to twenty-four-fold depending on wine style and dosage. Conclusions: Non-animal fining agents can achieve clarification performance comparable to conventional gelatine, supporting their potential as more sustainable and allergen-free alternatives. Nevertheless, despite higher costs, these alternatives may remain viable considering their technological performance and sustainability advantages. From a One Health perspective, these findings highlight the need to balance technological performance, economic feasibility, and sustainability in the transition towards more responsible wine production systems.

Science Letters
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.