A Comparative Assessment of Accessibility and Affordability of Services at Child Welfare Clinics of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Kwali General Hospital, Federal Capital Territory

Accessibility and affordability remain key pillars in the delivery of equitable and effective healthcare services, particularly in maternal and child health. Child Welfare Clinics (CWCs) provide essential preventive services such as immunization, growth monitoring, and health education. However, the ease with which caregivers can access these services and bear their financial costs influences utilization and health outcomes. This study comparatively assessed the accessibility and affordability of services at CWCs of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (UATH) and Kwali General Hospital (KGH), Abuja. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires from 362 respondents (181 per facility), and qualitative data were obtained through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Key indicators analysed included travel distance, transport availability, clinic hours, service costs, and perceived financial burden. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, logistic regression, and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. A higher proportion of respondents at KGH (74.0%) reported the clinic to be easily accessible compared to UATH (40.3%) (χ² = 33.072, p < 0.001). Affordability was significantly better at KGH, where 179 (98.9%) respondents considered services affordable, compared to only 13 (7.2%) at UATH (χ² = 295.518, p < 0.001). FGDs reinforced these findings, with participants at UATH citing high transport and service costs as key barriers. Accessibility was influenced by clinic proximity, alignment with caregiver schedules, and transport ease, while affordability was shaped by out-of-pocket expenditures and hidden costs. Significant disparities exist between tertiary and secondary healthcare facilities regarding access and cost of child welfare services. While UATH offers higher-tier services, barriers related to distance and financial burden limit service uptake. Interventions to improve transportation support, reduce user fees, and align service hours with caregiver schedules are essential to ensure equitable access and affordability across facility levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Health Systems
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmhs.2026.100234
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Assessment of Accessibility and Affordability of Services at Child Welfare Clinics of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Kwali General Hospital, Federal Capital Territory

Awayimbo Ruth Jaggu, Unekwuojo Iye Etubi-Ibrahim, Akolo Yohanna Jaggu, Biyaya Beatrice Nwonkwo
SSM - Health Systems
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

A Comparative Assessment of Accessibility and Affordability of Services at Child Welfare Clinics of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital and Kwali General Hospital, Federal Capital Territory

Awayimbo Ruth Jaggu, Unekwuojo Iye Etubi-Ibrahim, Akolo Yohanna Jaggu, Biyaya Beatrice Nwonkwo
article en

Abstract

Accessibility and affordability remain key pillars in the delivery of equitable and effective healthcare services, particularly in maternal and child health. Child Welfare Clinics (CWCs) provide essential preventive services such as immunization, growth monitoring, and health education. However, the ease with which caregivers can access these services and bear their financial costs influences utilization and health outcomes. This study comparatively assessed the accessibility and affordability of services at CWCs of University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (UATH) and Kwali General Hospital (KGH), Abuja. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected using structured questionnaires from 362 respondents (181 per facility), and qualitative data were obtained through Focus Group Discussions (FGDs). Key indicators analysed included travel distance, transport availability, clinic hours, service costs, and perceived financial burden. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, logistic regression, and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. A higher proportion of respondents at KGH (74.0%) reported the clinic to be easily accessible compared to UATH (40.3%) (χ² = 33.072, p < 0.001). Affordability was significantly better at KGH, where 179 (98.9%) respondents considered services affordable, compared to only 13 (7.2%) at UATH (χ² = 295.518, p < 0.001). FGDs reinforced these findings, with participants at UATH citing high transport and service costs as key barriers. Accessibility was influenced by clinic proximity, alignment with caregiver schedules, and transport ease, while affordability was shaped by out-of-pocket expenditures and hidden costs. Significant disparities exist between tertiary and secondary healthcare facilities regarding access and cost of child welfare services. While UATH offers higher-tier services, barriers related to distance and financial burden limit service uptake. Interventions to improve transportation support, reduce user fees, and align service hours with caregiver schedules are essential to ensure equitable access and affordability across facility levels.

SSM - Health Systems
Nasarawa State University (NG), University of Abuja Teaching Hospital (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.