The political and legal geographies of archives: Evidence, expertise, place

This paper establishes a framework for political and legal geographies of archives. Moving beyond catch-all definitions of ‘the archive’, it interrogates the specific practices and spaces by which materials become archival, the professional expertise required to do so, and the evidentiary authority this bestows. Marginalised groups – including Indigenous communities, unrepresented nations, and racial and religious minorities – must navigate a paradox of securing rights through the same archival structures that have historically facilitated their exclusion. Through interconnected lenses of evidence, expertise, and place, the paper draws attention to the contested and uneven processes by which community records are transformed into authoritative, admissible evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Human Geography
Published
2026-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325261446631
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The political and legal geographies of archives: Evidence, expertise, place

Fiona McConnell, Alex Manby, Jake Hodder
Progress in Human Geography
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

The political and legal geographies of archives: Evidence, expertise, place

Fiona McConnell, Alex Manby, Jake Hodder
article en

Abstract

This paper establishes a framework for political and legal geographies of archives. Moving beyond catch-all definitions of ‘the archive’, it interrogates the specific practices and spaces by which materials become archival, the professional expertise required to do so, and the evidentiary authority this bestows. Marginalised groups – including Indigenous communities, unrepresented nations, and racial and religious minorities – must navigate a paradox of securing rights through the same archival structures that have historically facilitated their exclusion. Through interconnected lenses of evidence, expertise, and place, the paper draws attention to the contested and uneven processes by which community records are transformed into authoritative, admissible evidence.

Progress in Human Geography
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Oxford (GB)
Leverhulme Trust
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.