Evaluating the validity and reliability of AI-generated rubrics for EAP assessments: A case study in a transnational university

This case study examines the effectiveness of AI-generated rubrics for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) assessments at a transnational university, focusing on analytic rubrics produced by ChatGPT. Rubrics are essential for structured grading, enhancing clarity and consistency ( Andrade & Du, 2005 ; Campbell, 2005 ). However, creating detailed descriptors can be time-consuming. The study evaluates AI-generated rubrics in promoting grading consistency among instructors during standardization meetings, where they scored sample papers. The analysis focused on the validity and reliability of the rubrics, guided by Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) standards (McKeown & Biss, 2018). Findings provide insights and recommendations for integrating these rubrics into EAP assessments. This article was published open access under a CC BY-NC-ND licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developing Academic Practice
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/dap.2026.14
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the validity and reliability of AI-generated rubrics for EAP assessments: A case study in a transnational university

Jiashi Wang, Anying Wang
Developing Academic Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluating the validity and reliability of AI-generated rubrics for EAP assessments: A case study in a transnational university

Jiashi Wang, Anying Wang
article en

Abstract

This case study examines the effectiveness of AI-generated rubrics for English for Academic Purposes (EAP) assessments at a transnational university, focusing on analytic rubrics produced by ChatGPT. Rubrics are essential for structured grading, enhancing clarity and consistency ( Andrade & Du, 2005 ; Campbell, 2005 ). However, creating detailed descriptors can be time-consuming. The study evaluates AI-generated rubrics in promoting grading consistency among instructors during standardization meetings, where they scored sample papers. The analysis focused on the validity and reliability of the rubrics, guided by Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario (HEQCO) standards (McKeown & Biss, 2018). Findings provide insights and recommendations for integrating these rubrics into EAP assessments. This article was published open access under a CC BY-NC-ND licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Developing Academic PracticeVol. 2026(Special)
Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.