PICCOS: study protocol for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of cancers of the colon, ovary and stomach: a randomised controlled, phase II trial of efficacy in peritoneal metastases

Abstract Objectives Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a significant unmet need requiring urgent development of treatment options to improve patient prognosis and quality of life (QoL). A novel anti-cancer technology is Pressurised IntraPeritoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy (PIPAC). PIPAC aims to improve target specificity of anti-cancer therapies by delivering medication as an aerosol directly to the peritoneum at laparoscopy. Early phase I/II studies suggest that PIPAC has the potential to improve treatment efficacy and cancer outcomes whilst maintaining or improving QoL through less systemic drug absorption. PICCOS aims to determine whether PIPAC can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) in patients with PM from, compared to SACT alone. Methods PICCOS is a phase II, multi-centre, superiority, randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 17575409). It aims to determine whether PIPAC (given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT)) can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) as per RECIST (V1.1) in patients with PM, compared to SACT alone. Key secondary outcome measures include quality of life, safety, overall survival and progression free survival. 216 patients with non-resectable PM from colorectal cancer, platinum resistant ovarian cancer and gastric cancer will be recruited. Patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care SACT alone or PIPAC in combination with (colorectal, gastric groups) or without (ovarian group) standard of care SACT. Median pPFS will be estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test, stratified by prognostic factors, will be used to compare PFS distributions. Results PIPAC is expected to achieve improved peritoneal progression free survival for patients in comparison to those treated with standard care. Conclusions PICCOS aims to provide much needed, high-quality evidence on the efficacy of PIPAC in treating PM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pleura and Peritoneum
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2025-0023
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PICCOS: study protocol for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of cancers of the colon, ovary and stomach: a randomised controlled, phase II trial of efficacy in peritoneal metastases

Joy Garfitt, Anuoluwa Ajakaiye, Amy Case, Leona Batten et al.
Pleura and Peritoneum
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

PICCOS: study protocol for pressurised intraperitoneal aerosolised chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the management of cancers of the colon, ovary and stomach: a randomised controlled, phase II trial of efficacy in peritoneal metastases

Joy Garfitt, Anuoluwa Ajakaiye, Amy Case, Leona Batten, Jane Blazeby, Kitrick Perry, Jamie Murphy, Peter Kyle, Gina Brown, Elena Brogden, Emma Hudson, Richard Adams, Maureen Edgar, David Chuter, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Philip Markham, Harry Hall, Sophie Tate, Daisy Elliott, Karen Arndell, Sarah Gwynne, Angela Casbard, Jared Torkington, Sadie E.F. Jones, Rebecca Hamilton, Huda Mohamed, Rhiannon Macefield, Lisette Nixon, Christopher J. Peters, Jonathan Frost
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Peritoneal metastases (PM) represent a significant unmet need requiring urgent development of treatment options to improve patient prognosis and quality of life (QoL). A novel anti-cancer technology is Pressurised IntraPeritoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy (PIPAC). PIPAC aims to improve target specificity of anti-cancer therapies by delivering medication as an aerosol directly to the peritoneum at laparoscopy. Early phase I/II studies suggest that PIPAC has the potential to improve treatment efficacy and cancer outcomes whilst maintaining or improving QoL through less systemic drug absorption. PICCOS aims to determine whether PIPAC can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) in patients with PM from, compared to SACT alone. Methods PICCOS is a phase II, multi-centre, superiority, randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN 17575409). It aims to determine whether PIPAC (given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT)) can improve peritoneal progression free survival (pPFS) as per RECIST (V1.1) in patients with PM, compared to SACT alone. Key secondary outcome measures include quality of life, safety, overall survival and progression free survival. 216 patients with non-resectable PM from colorectal cancer, platinum resistant ovarian cancer and gastric cancer will be recruited. Patients will be randomised to receive either standard of care SACT alone or PIPAC in combination with (colorectal, gastric groups) or without (ovarian group) standard of care SACT. Median pPFS will be estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The log-rank test, stratified by prognostic factors, will be used to compare PFS distributions. Results PIPAC is expected to achieve improved peritoneal progression free survival for patients in comparison to those treated with standard care. Conclusions PICCOS aims to provide much needed, high-quality evidence on the efficacy of PIPAC in treating PM.

Pleura and Peritoneum
Swansea Bay University Health Board (GB), Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (GB), Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), Velindre NHS Trust (GB), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Swansea University (GB), Bronllys Hospital (GB), National Health Service Wales (GB), Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust (GB), The Patients Association (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Cardiff University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.