Oculomotor Dysfunctions in Nonreading Tasks in Children With Dyslexia: Saccadic and Optokinetic Findings

BACKGROUND: Dyslexia has been associated with atypical eye-movement control, but whether such differences arise only during reading or reflect broader oculomotor control remains debated. METHODS: ). Primary outcomes were peak velocity (°/s), accuracy (%) and latency (ms); optokinetic responses (OKR) were analysed for each eye, and we report the interocular OKR difference (%). Trials with blinks/track-loss were excluded a priori. RESULTS: Compared with controls, children with dyslexia showed slower saccades (307.5°/s vs. 453.5°/s), lower accuracy (71.5% vs. 98.5%) and longer latency (260.0 vs. 131.5 ms), all p < 0.001. Right-eye OKR was reduced, whereas left-eye OKR did not differ significantly, and the interocular OKR difference was significantly larger in dyslexia. These group differences remained significant after adjustment for relevant socio-demographic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Children with dyslexia exhibited robust oculomotor differences during a nonreading task, consistent with altered visually guided saccade control. These results are associative rather than causal and suggest that oculomotor measures may provide complementary insight into dyslexia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jdn.70132
Primary Topic
Reading and Literacy Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oculomotor Dysfunctions in Nonreading Tasks in Children With Dyslexia: Saccadic and Optokinetic Findings

Şahin Bodur, Mehmet Ayhan Cöngöloğlu, Ceren Karaçaylı, Melikşah Safa Üçok et al.
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience
Reading and Literacy Development
article

Oculomotor Dysfunctions in Nonreading Tasks in Children With Dyslexia: Saccadic and Optokinetic Findings

Şahin Bodur, Mehmet Ayhan Cöngöloğlu, Ceren Karaçaylı, Melikşah Safa Üçok, Mustafa Dinçer, Esra Güngör Bağlıcakoğlu, Pınar Ayaroğlu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dyslexia has been associated with atypical eye-movement control, but whether such differences arise only during reading or reflect broader oculomotor control remains debated. METHODS: ). Primary outcomes were peak velocity (°/s), accuracy (%) and latency (ms); optokinetic responses (OKR) were analysed for each eye, and we report the interocular OKR difference (%). Trials with blinks/track-loss were excluded a priori. RESULTS: Compared with controls, children with dyslexia showed slower saccades (307.5°/s vs. 453.5°/s), lower accuracy (71.5% vs. 98.5%) and longer latency (260.0 vs. 131.5 ms), all p < 0.001. Right-eye OKR was reduced, whereas left-eye OKR did not differ significantly, and the interocular OKR difference was significantly larger in dyslexia. These group differences remained significant after adjustment for relevant socio-demographic covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Children with dyslexia exhibited robust oculomotor differences during a nonreading task, consistent with altered visually guided saccade control. These results are associative rather than causal and suggest that oculomotor measures may provide complementary insight into dyslexia.

International Journal of Developmental NeuroscienceVol. 86(3)
University of Health Science (KH), Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Memorial Ankara Hospital (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University (TR), Adnan Menderes University (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reading and Literacy Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.