Chiral HPLC method optimization for enantioseparation of 2-methylmethcathinone

Background: 2-Methylmethcathinone (2‑MMC) is a chiral new psychoactive substance whose enantiomers may differ in pharmacological and toxicological behavior. Reliable enantioselective analysis is therefore required for forensic and environmental applications. Recent work shows that polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are broadly effective for cathinones [1]. Objective: This study aims to develop and optimize a rapid, robust high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC‑UV) method achieving baseline separation [resolution (Rs) ≥ 1.5] of 2‑MMC enantiomers. Methods: A two‑stage workflow was used. First, a screening compared a Lux AMP 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) under ammonium bicarbonate (pH 11) with methanol or acetonitrile (isocratic/gradient) against a Lux Amylose‑1 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) operated in normal‑phase (n‑hexane/isopropanol). Ultraviolet detection was set at 254 nm. Performance criteria included Rs and run time. Results: The Lux AMP configuration yielded limited enantioresolution across tested conditions (maximum Rs ≈ 1.11). In contrast, Lux Amylose‑1, with n‑hexane/isopropanol as mobile phase, produced baseline separation of 2‑MMC enantiomers (Rs > 1.5) with short analysis times and consistent retention, providing suitable peak shape and repeatability. These outcomes align with literature showing high success rates of amylose/cellulose CSPs for cathinones under normal‑phase and polar‑organic modes [2,3]. Conclusions: The screening‑to‑optimization strategy delivered a fast enantioselective HPLC‑UV method for 2‑MMC. Beyond analytical separation, the method provides a robust platform to develop and adapt enantioselective procedures for biological samples (e.g., oral fluid, blood, urine), enabling enantiomer‑resolved quantification in clinical and forensic toxicology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.496
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chiral HPLC method optimization for enantioseparation of 2-methylmethcathinone

Cláudia Maria Rosa Ribeiro, Maria E. Tiritan, Alexandra S. Maia, Virgínia Gonçalves et al.
Science Letters
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

Chiral HPLC method optimization for enantioseparation of 2-methylmethcathinone

Cláudia Maria Rosa Ribeiro, Maria E. Tiritan, Alexandra S. Maia, Virgínia Gonçalves, Ivan Langa, Sara Gojkovic
article en

Abstract

Background: 2-Methylmethcathinone (2‑MMC) is a chiral new psychoactive substance whose enantiomers may differ in pharmacological and toxicological behavior. Reliable enantioselective analysis is therefore required for forensic and environmental applications. Recent work shows that polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are broadly effective for cathinones [1]. Objective: This study aims to develop and optimize a rapid, robust high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC‑UV) method achieving baseline separation [resolution (Rs) ≥ 1.5] of 2‑MMC enantiomers. Methods: A two‑stage workflow was used. First, a screening compared a Lux AMP 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) under ammonium bicarbonate (pH 11) with methanol or acetonitrile (isocratic/gradient) against a Lux Amylose‑1 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) operated in normal‑phase (n‑hexane/isopropanol). Ultraviolet detection was set at 254 nm. Performance criteria included Rs and run time. Results: The Lux AMP configuration yielded limited enantioresolution across tested conditions (maximum Rs ≈ 1.11). In contrast, Lux Amylose‑1, with n‑hexane/isopropanol as mobile phase, produced baseline separation of 2‑MMC enantiomers (Rs > 1.5) with short analysis times and consistent retention, providing suitable peak shape and repeatability. These outcomes align with literature showing high success rates of amylose/cellulose CSPs for cathinones under normal‑phase and polar‑organic modes [2,3]. Conclusions: The screening‑to‑optimization strategy delivered a fast enantioselective HPLC‑UV method for 2‑MMC. Beyond analytical separation, the method provides a robust platform to develop and adapt enantioselective procedures for biological samples (e.g., oral fluid, blood, urine), enabling enantiomer‑resolved quantification in clinical and forensic toxicology.

Science Letters
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.