Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification

Background: Cannabis sativa L. has become widely cultivated. The inflorescences, resins, and oils derived from this plant are employed for both medicinal and recreational purposes, primarily due to the effects associated with cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and the psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). However, cannabis plants biosynthesize these compounds in their acidic forms, necessitating a decarboxylation process during the extraction phase [1]. Moreover, depending on the final formulation, the extracts may undergo further purification before being incorporated into the final product. These steps enhance the quality of the end product and increase its attractiveness to consumers [2]. Objective: This research aims to understand the variations in Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA), Δ9-THC, and cannabinol (CBN) during the sample processing of the THC-rich cultivar Z-Face. The processing steps include the decarboxylation of acidic cannabinoids, Soxhlet extraction, and purification of extracts through winterization and activated charcoal treatment. Methods: Decarboxylation was performed at 120 ºC for 1 hour. This was followed by a 2-hour Soxhlet extraction with 96% ethanol to extract cannabinoids. The solution underwent winterization at -80 ºC for 24 hours to remove waxes and lipids. Finally, 50% (w/w) activated charcoal was added and mixed for 1 hour to remove chlorophyll and other pigments. Cannabinoid quantification was conducted using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC-DAD system, equipped with an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (3.0 x 150 mm, 2.7 µm) [3]. Results: Each step was refined by: (i) Conducting decarboxylation studies at varying temperatures and durations to effectively convert Δ9-THCA into Δ9-THC, while achieving minimal CBN formation; (ii) Optimizing Soxhlet extraction time and number of cycles; (iii) Determining the appropriate winterization temperature and duration; and (iv) Examining the percentage of activated charcoal used, along with the temperature and duration of treatment. Conclusions: The extraction and processing of THC-rich Z-Face flowers, initially containing 16.5% Δ9-THCA (15.6% total Δ9-THC), resulted in final extracts with 58.9% Δ9-THC, corresponding to an 8.9% enrichment during the purification steps.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2026-04-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.506
Primary Topic
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification

Carlos J. A. Ribeiro, Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, Ana F. Morais
Science Letters
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
article

Exploring cannabinoid profile changes during cannabis flower decarboxylation, extraction, and purification

Carlos J. A. Ribeiro, Ricardo Jorge Dinis-Oliveira, Ana F. Morais
article en

Abstract

Background: Cannabis sativa L. has become widely cultivated. The inflorescences, resins, and oils derived from this plant are employed for both medicinal and recreational purposes, primarily due to the effects associated with cannabinoids such as cannabidiol (CBD) and the psychoactive Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC). However, cannabis plants biosynthesize these compounds in their acidic forms, necessitating a decarboxylation process during the extraction phase [1]. Moreover, depending on the final formulation, the extracts may undergo further purification before being incorporated into the final product. These steps enhance the quality of the end product and increase its attractiveness to consumers [2]. Objective: This research aims to understand the variations in Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (Δ9-THCA), Δ9-THC, and cannabinol (CBN) during the sample processing of the THC-rich cultivar Z-Face. The processing steps include the decarboxylation of acidic cannabinoids, Soxhlet extraction, and purification of extracts through winterization and activated charcoal treatment. Methods: Decarboxylation was performed at 120 ºC for 1 hour. This was followed by a 2-hour Soxhlet extraction with 96% ethanol to extract cannabinoids. The solution underwent winterization at -80 ºC for 24 hours to remove waxes and lipids. Finally, 50% (w/w) activated charcoal was added and mixed for 1 hour to remove chlorophyll and other pigments. Cannabinoid quantification was conducted using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II HPLC-DAD system, equipped with an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (3.0 x 150 mm, 2.7 µm) [3]. Results: Each step was refined by: (i) Conducting decarboxylation studies at varying temperatures and durations to effectively convert Δ9-THCA into Δ9-THC, while achieving minimal CBN formation; (ii) Optimizing Soxhlet extraction time and number of cycles; (iii) Determining the appropriate winterization temperature and duration; and (iv) Examining the percentage of activated charcoal used, along with the temperature and duration of treatment. Conclusions: The extraction and processing of THC-rich Z-Face flowers, initially containing 16.5% Δ9-THCA (15.6% total Δ9-THC), resulted in final extracts with 58.9% Δ9-THC, corresponding to an 8.9% enrichment during the purification steps.

Science Letters
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.