Beyond “painting in pink”: A critical case study of all-girls generative AI workshops in a European makerspace and implications for gender equity in computing

Equity-oriented uses of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) remain largely underexplored. To address the persistent gender inequities in girls’ representation and participation in computing, we present a case study of an all-girls initiative incorporating two GenAI tools in a European makerspace. We analysed qualitative, multimodal data, including 15 interviews with girls, parents, and practitioners, four reflective sessions, two observation fieldnotes, and 44 GenAI-generated images. Harding’s (1986) multi-level framework and feminist pedagogy provide critical lenses through which to examine and discuss the practice and practitioners’ reflections. Stakeholders generally expressed positive views of the all-girls workshop format. Practitioners enacted three steps to support girls’ participation and engagement in GenAI workshops, namely representation, relationship building, and a responsive approach. However, several issues and challenges emerged in practice, including an inappropriate workshop topic, limited peer collaboration, the inaccessibility of the selected GenAI tools, and language barriers associated with prompt-writing. These challenges revealed underlying issues related to the marginalisation of girls’ voices, agency, and assets. We argue that gender-equity interventions in computing need to move beyond the superficial “painting in pink” of girlification and instead centre girls’ voices, agency, and assets through changes across symbolic, structural, social, and individual levels. The study proposes a girl-centred, multi-level framework and practical implications for the use of GenAI to promote gender equity in computing, while also calling for further research and practice on equity-oriented applications of GenAI. This paper deepens understanding of what it means to centre girls in computing and contributes new empirical and critical insights into how GenAI may be leveraged to advance gender equity and inform the design of related interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100602
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond “painting in pink”: A critical case study of all-girls generative AI workshops in a European makerspace and implications for gender equity in computing

Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Meghna Nag Chowdhuri, Esme Freedman et al.
Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Beyond “painting in pink”: A critical case study of all-girls generative AI workshops in a European makerspace and implications for gender equity in computing

Louise Archer, Jennifer DeWitt, Meghna Nag Chowdhuri, Esme Freedman, Qian Liu
article en

Abstract

Equity-oriented uses of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) remain largely underexplored. To address the persistent gender inequities in girls’ representation and participation in computing, we present a case study of an all-girls initiative incorporating two GenAI tools in a European makerspace. We analysed qualitative, multimodal data, including 15 interviews with girls, parents, and practitioners, four reflective sessions, two observation fieldnotes, and 44 GenAI-generated images. Harding’s (1986) multi-level framework and feminist pedagogy provide critical lenses through which to examine and discuss the practice and practitioners’ reflections. Stakeholders generally expressed positive views of the all-girls workshop format. Practitioners enacted three steps to support girls’ participation and engagement in GenAI workshops, namely representation, relationship building, and a responsive approach. However, several issues and challenges emerged in practice, including an inappropriate workshop topic, limited peer collaboration, the inaccessibility of the selected GenAI tools, and language barriers associated with prompt-writing. These challenges revealed underlying issues related to the marginalisation of girls’ voices, agency, and assets. We argue that gender-equity interventions in computing need to move beyond the superficial “painting in pink” of girlification and instead centre girls’ voices, agency, and assets through changes across symbolic, structural, social, and individual levels. The study proposes a girl-centred, multi-level framework and practical implications for the use of GenAI to promote gender equity in computing, while also calling for further research and practice on equity-oriented applications of GenAI. This paper deepens understanding of what it means to centre girls in computing and contributes new empirical and critical insights into how GenAI may be leveraged to advance gender equity and inform the design of related interventions.

Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
University College London (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.