AI or nay? How students balance the benefits and limitations of generative AI in higher education

The rapid growth in awareness of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies since late 2022 has significantly impacted academia, with generative AI (GenAI) tools becoming increasingly prevalent in educational settings. Universities are struggling to keep up with the rapid changes in GenAI capabilities, creating an environment where staff and students do not have the necessary support and understanding to use these tools responsibly. The present study aims to develop understanding of how students are engaging with GenAI within the university context. Seven students (five undergraduate and two postgraduate), recruited as part of a wider questionnaire study, participated in an online interview to discuss their experiences of using GenAI in an educational context. Deductive thematic analysis was used to identify and analyse the following five themes: i) usage and perception of GenAI tools, ii) academic support and learning, iii) academic integrity and policy, iv) ethical use, and v) creativity and inspirational uses. It was found that the prevalence of GenAI use is often based on previous experience with such tools. However, this is mediated by local and wider-level guidance. Ethical concerns surrounding data use and academic integrity reduce student use. The findings shed light on student experience of GenAI, highlighting the opportunities and challenges in an academic setting. This has implications for the development of university and departmental level policies relating to the use of GenAI by students. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Developing Academic Practice
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/dap.2026.16
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI or nay? How students balance the benefits and limitations of generative AI in higher education

Ceridwen Coulby, Rob Lindsay, AMY FARRELL, Catherine Stevens et al.
Developing Academic Practice
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI or nay? How students balance the benefits and limitations of generative AI in higher education

Ceridwen Coulby, Rob Lindsay, AMY FARRELL, Catherine Stevens, Qi Qi Saw, Samuel Saunders, Claire Ellison, Charlotte Barton, Caroline Hands
article en

Abstract

The rapid growth in awareness of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies since late 2022 has significantly impacted academia, with generative AI (GenAI) tools becoming increasingly prevalent in educational settings. Universities are struggling to keep up with the rapid changes in GenAI capabilities, creating an environment where staff and students do not have the necessary support and understanding to use these tools responsibly. The present study aims to develop understanding of how students are engaging with GenAI within the university context. Seven students (five undergraduate and two postgraduate), recruited as part of a wider questionnaire study, participated in an online interview to discuss their experiences of using GenAI in an educational context. Deductive thematic analysis was used to identify and analyse the following five themes: i) usage and perception of GenAI tools, ii) academic support and learning, iii) academic integrity and policy, iv) ethical use, and v) creativity and inspirational uses. It was found that the prevalence of GenAI use is often based on previous experience with such tools. However, this is mediated by local and wider-level guidance. Ethical concerns surrounding data use and academic integrity reduce student use. The findings shed light on student experience of GenAI, highlighting the opportunities and challenges in an academic setting. This has implications for the development of university and departmental level policies relating to the use of GenAI by students. This article was published open access under a CC BY licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Developing Academic PracticeVol. 2026(Special)
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Liverpool (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.