Ecotoxicological effects of the plant protection product NATIVO on non-target terrestrial plants: an integrated toxicity index approach

Background: The ecotoxicological assessment of fungicides is essential for understanding their potential impacts on non-target organisms and for supporting environmental risk assessment [1,2]. In this context, the fungicide NATIVO is widely used in agriculture to control fungal diseases in various crops. However, intensive use may promote the dispersion of active compounds into soils, posing a potential risk to non-target organisms such as terrestrial plants. Objective: To evaluate the phytotoxicity effects of the fungicide in four terrestrial plants (Pennisetum glaucum, Triticum aestivum, Lactuca sativa, and Raphanus sativus) using germination, development, and growth endpoints. Methods: Plant bioassays were performed according to the guidelines of OECD 208 and ISO 18763, for 72h under controlled conditions in the dark. For each species, 8 concentrations (1-93 µL/L) of the commercial product NATIVO were evaluated, with 6 replicates per treatment, and 10 seeds per replicate. After exposure, parameters related to germination and early seedling development were evaluated. Subsequently, for each parameter and treatment, the percentage of effect was calculated. Based on these values, the doses were classified into toxicity indices (non-toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic), following the ecotoxicological thresholds related to EC₁₀ and EC₅₀ [3]. Finally, a toxicity index was estimated based on the integrated response of the evaluated parameters for each species. Results: In general, the most pronounced effects were observed in the root and shoot growth parameters. For root growth, L. sativa and T. aestivum exhibited inhibition percentages exceeding 50%, with NATIVO classified as toxic for this parameter and species. For shoot growth, L. sativa, R. sativus, and P. glaucum exhibited inhibition percentages exceeding 50%, and NATIVO was also classified as toxic for this endpoint and species. The integrated analysis indicated greater sensitivity of L. sativa, followed by R. sativus, T. aestivum, and P. glaucum to NATIVO. Conclusions: NATIVO exposure can significantly impair early development, particularly growth-related parameters of terrestrial plants. Residual contamination in soils may therefore affect plant establishment and regeneration processes. These findings underscore the importance of considering diverse plant species in ecotoxicological studies to provide a more realistic assessment of the environmental risks associated with fungicide use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.433
Primary Topic
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecotoxicological effects of the plant protection product NATIVO on non-target terrestrial plants: an integrated toxicity index approach

Milena Moreira Grilo, Franciele Domingos, Bianca Ribeiro Martins, Guilherme Edson de Souza et al.
Science Letters
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
article

Ecotoxicological effects of the plant protection product NATIVO on non-target terrestrial plants: an integrated toxicity index approach

Milena Moreira Grilo, Franciele Domingos, Bianca Ribeiro Martins, Guilherme Edson de Souza, Sara Rodrigues, Larissa Fonseca Andrade Vieira
article en

Abstract

Background: The ecotoxicological assessment of fungicides is essential for understanding their potential impacts on non-target organisms and for supporting environmental risk assessment [1,2]. In this context, the fungicide NATIVO is widely used in agriculture to control fungal diseases in various crops. However, intensive use may promote the dispersion of active compounds into soils, posing a potential risk to non-target organisms such as terrestrial plants. Objective: To evaluate the phytotoxicity effects of the fungicide in four terrestrial plants (Pennisetum glaucum, Triticum aestivum, Lactuca sativa, and Raphanus sativus) using germination, development, and growth endpoints. Methods: Plant bioassays were performed according to the guidelines of OECD 208 and ISO 18763, for 72h under controlled conditions in the dark. For each species, 8 concentrations (1-93 µL/L) of the commercial product NATIVO were evaluated, with 6 replicates per treatment, and 10 seeds per replicate. After exposure, parameters related to germination and early seedling development were evaluated. Subsequently, for each parameter and treatment, the percentage of effect was calculated. Based on these values, the doses were classified into toxicity indices (non-toxic, moderately toxic, and toxic), following the ecotoxicological thresholds related to EC₁₀ and EC₅₀ [3]. Finally, a toxicity index was estimated based on the integrated response of the evaluated parameters for each species. Results: In general, the most pronounced effects were observed in the root and shoot growth parameters. For root growth, L. sativa and T. aestivum exhibited inhibition percentages exceeding 50%, with NATIVO classified as toxic for this parameter and species. For shoot growth, L. sativa, R. sativus, and P. glaucum exhibited inhibition percentages exceeding 50%, and NATIVO was also classified as toxic for this endpoint and species. The integrated analysis indicated greater sensitivity of L. sativa, followed by R. sativus, T. aestivum, and P. glaucum to NATIVO. Conclusions: NATIVO exposure can significantly impair early development, particularly growth-related parameters of terrestrial plants. Residual contamination in soils may therefore affect plant establishment and regeneration processes. These findings underscore the importance of considering diverse plant species in ecotoxicological studies to provide a more realistic assessment of the environmental risks associated with fungicide use.

Science Letters
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.