Empowering large litters: Can enhanced pen design with simulated udders improve piglet growth in their early life?

Abstract Hyper-prolific sows produce large litters, which results in greater birth weight variation and an increased need for nurse sows. This study explored ways to optimize expanded farrowing pen space, following European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendations, to help loose-housed sows manage litter sizes that surpass their available teat capacity. The aim was to enhance piglet growth and mortality while maintaining efficient production. A total of 66 litters were randomly assigned to one of two groups at birth: a control group (CON; n = 33) or a treatment group (TRT; n = 33), and only piglets born weighing more than 750 g were included in each group. From birth until weaning, CON sows nursed 16 piglets per litter, while TRT sows nursed 20 piglets. During the first three days postpartum, an enclosure setup was present in the creep area of pens housing TRT litters. In this enclosure, the four smallest piglets (S) were confined for six hours with access to milk replacer (MR), followed by the next four smallest (M) for another six hours, while the four largest piglets (L) were confined overnight for 12 hours. The last eight piglets from the TRT group were reared by the sow (SRT). In contrast, piglets in the CON group remained with the sow without intervention. Piglet weights were tracked daily from day one to three, with additional measurements taken on days 11, 18, and 25. No difference in litter weight gain was observed between the two groups from day one to three. However, litter weight gain was higher in CON compared with TRT in the entire study period (2.529 vs. 2.034 kg/day; P = 0.005). No difference in mortality was observed between TRT and CON from days 1–3. However, it was significantly higher in TRT than CON from day 3–24 (18.4% vs. 9.0%; P = 0.0006). Within TRT, L piglets maintained the highest body weight, while S piglets had the lowest (6.674 vs. 4.104 kg at day 25; P < 0.0001). ADG differed only in the first three days, where SRT piglets grew fastest (108 g/day; P < 0.0001). Milk disappearance was consistently highest in L piglets (297 g/6 h corrected; P < 0.0001). Mortality was highest in S piglets (60%), intermediate in M (30%), and lowest in L (11%) and SRT piglets (18%; P < 0.0001). The enclosure setup might assist hyper-prolific sows in rearing large litters; however, no direct benefits on growth performance were observed. These findings suggest that further interventions are necessary to support piglets throughout the entire suckling phase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Animal Science
Published
2026-04-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txag054
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering large litters: Can enhanced pen design with simulated udders improve piglet growth in their early life?

Johannes Gulmann Madsen, Christina Larsen, Vivi Aarestrup Moustsen, Mai Britt Nielsen et al.
Translational Animal Science
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Empowering large litters: Can enhanced pen design with simulated udders improve piglet growth in their early life?

Johannes Gulmann Madsen, Christina Larsen, Vivi Aarestrup Moustsen, Mai Britt Nielsen, Joas Martijn van der Linden
article en

Abstract

Abstract Hyper-prolific sows produce large litters, which results in greater birth weight variation and an increased need for nurse sows. This study explored ways to optimize expanded farrowing pen space, following European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommendations, to help loose-housed sows manage litter sizes that surpass their available teat capacity. The aim was to enhance piglet growth and mortality while maintaining efficient production. A total of 66 litters were randomly assigned to one of two groups at birth: a control group (CON; n = 33) or a treatment group (TRT; n = 33), and only piglets born weighing more than 750 g were included in each group. From birth until weaning, CON sows nursed 16 piglets per litter, while TRT sows nursed 20 piglets. During the first three days postpartum, an enclosure setup was present in the creep area of pens housing TRT litters. In this enclosure, the four smallest piglets (S) were confined for six hours with access to milk replacer (MR), followed by the next four smallest (M) for another six hours, while the four largest piglets (L) were confined overnight for 12 hours. The last eight piglets from the TRT group were reared by the sow (SRT). In contrast, piglets in the CON group remained with the sow without intervention. Piglet weights were tracked daily from day one to three, with additional measurements taken on days 11, 18, and 25. No difference in litter weight gain was observed between the two groups from day one to three. However, litter weight gain was higher in CON compared with TRT in the entire study period (2.529 vs. 2.034 kg/day; P = 0.005). No difference in mortality was observed between TRT and CON from days 1–3. However, it was significantly higher in TRT than CON from day 3–24 (18.4% vs. 9.0%; P = 0.0006). Within TRT, L piglets maintained the highest body weight, while S piglets had the lowest (6.674 vs. 4.104 kg at day 25; P < 0.0001). ADG differed only in the first three days, where SRT piglets grew fastest (108 g/day; P < 0.0001). Milk disappearance was consistently highest in L piglets (297 g/6 h corrected; P < 0.0001). Mortality was highest in S piglets (60%), intermediate in M (30%), and lowest in L (11%) and SRT piglets (18%; P < 0.0001). The enclosure setup might assist hyper-prolific sows in rearing large litters; however, no direct benefits on growth performance were observed. These findings suggest that further interventions are necessary to support piglets throughout the entire suckling phase.

Translational Animal Science
University of Copenhagen (DK), Knowledge Centre for Agriculture (DK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.