A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Prediction in GlioblastomaPatients Using Advanced MRI Techniques

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. Recent advances in radiomics and machine learning (ML) applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated promising potential in enhancing clinical decision-making and prognostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of radiomics and ML techniques applied to pre-treatment MRI data in glioblastoma prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2024 for studies using radiomics or ML techniques applied to pre-treatment MRI scans to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma patients. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising a total of 2,342 patients were included. MRI-based machine learning models demonstrated high predictive performance for glioblastoma prognosis (AUC: 0.71-0.92), with a tendency to outperform radiomics-based approaches (AUC: 0.68-0.88). A meta-analysis of 12 studies yielded a pooled AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82; P < 0.001) for PFS prediction with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 59%). Four studies focused on OS prediction, showing no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and a pooled AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that ML models (AUC: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.78-0.87]) statistically outperformed radiomics-based models (AUC: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.71-0.80]) for PFS prediction (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Radiomics and ML approaches based on pre-treatment MRI are promising tools for predicting survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients, with ML models demonstrating a slight edge over radiomics for PFS prediction. Standardized protocols and larger multi-center studies are warranted to facilitate clinical adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056396670251114101647
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Prediction in GlioblastomaPatients Using Advanced MRI Techniques

Yasser Noorelahi, Mohammed Ahmed Alsubhi, Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Leen Yahya Alqahtany et al.
Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survival Prediction in GlioblastomaPatients Using Advanced MRI Techniques

Yasser Noorelahi, Mohammed Ahmed Alsubhi, Abdulsalam Mohammed Aleid, Leen Yahya Alqahtany, Bedoor Obidallah Alghanmi, Rakan Almutairi, Saud Saeed N Alasmari, Sarah Hamed Talebi, Zayd Osama Jastaniah, Rana Anas Beser, Muaath Hamdan AlJehani
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with a dismal prognosis. Recent advances in radiomics and machine learning (ML) applied to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have demonstrated promising potential in enhancing clinical decision-making and prognostic accuracy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of radiomics and ML techniques applied to pre-treatment MRI data in glioblastoma prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to March 2024 for studies using radiomics or ML techniques applied to pre-treatment MRI scans to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma patients. The primary outcome was the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool, meta-analysis employed a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Sixteen studies comprising a total of 2,342 patients were included. MRI-based machine learning models demonstrated high predictive performance for glioblastoma prognosis (AUC: 0.71-0.92), with a tendency to outperform radiomics-based approaches (AUC: 0.68-0.88). A meta-analysis of 12 studies yielded a pooled AUC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82; P < 0.001) for PFS prediction with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 59%). Four studies focused on OS prediction, showing no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%) and a pooled AUC of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.85; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed that ML models (AUC: 0.83 [95% CI: 0.78-0.87]) statistically outperformed radiomics-based models (AUC: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.71-0.80]) for PFS prediction (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Radiomics and ML approaches based on pre-treatment MRI are promising tools for predicting survival outcomes in glioblastoma patients, with ML models demonstrating a slight edge over radiomics for PFS prediction. Standardized protocols and larger multi-center studies are warranted to facilitate clinical adoption.

Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging ReviewsVol. 22
King Abdulaziz University (SA), Majmaah University (SA), King Saud University (SA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), Batterjee Medical College, King Faisal University (SA), Al Baha University (SA), King Khalid University (SA), Jazan University (SA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.