Modeling and Reasoning over Observations: An Ontology for Literary Criticism

In the scope of the Digital Humanities, it is useful to represent and reason about data that make explicit observations (claims) on the subjects being studied. This is particularly interesting in criticism, where scholars debate different topics, sometimes grounding their claims on what others have said, some other times rejecting and even contradicting them. In this paper we present an ontology, in the form of a Semantic Web model, to support the documentation, analysis, and management of observational data. Our ontology focuses on literary criticism, although its design follows a modular architecture, enabling its use in other application contexts. We discuss throughout the paper the motivations for our research, as well as its potential and limitations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-04-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26083/tuda-7993
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling and Reasoning over Observations: An Ontology for Literary Criticism

Alessandro Mosca, Emilio M. Sanfilippo, Gaia Tomazzoli, Claudio Masolo
Open MIND
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Modeling and Reasoning over Observations: An Ontology for Literary Criticism

Alessandro Mosca, Emilio M. Sanfilippo, Gaia Tomazzoli, Claudio Masolo
article en

Abstract

In the scope of the Digital Humanities, it is useful to represent and reason about data that make explicit observations (claims) on the subjects being studied. This is particularly interesting in criticism, where scholars debate different topics, sometimes grounding their claims on what others have said, some other times rejecting and even contradicting them. In this paper we present an ontology, in the form of a Semantic Web model, to support the documentation, analysis, and management of observational data. Our ontology focuses on literary criticism, although its design follows a modular architecture, enabling its use in other application contexts. We discuss throughout the paper the motivations for our research, as well as its potential and limitations.

Open MIND
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.